Monday: Trump Picked Warsh to Fix Rates. Now He's Eyeing a Hike.

Rush LindellYou know what nobody wants to say? Trump started the Iran war, broke the Fed's rate cut path, and is still out there demanding cheaper money. That is the full story. Welcome to the Rush Lindell Show. I'm Rush Lindell.

ReaganAnd I'm Reagan. Glad you're with us today. This one's worth your hour.

Rush LindellSo here's what happened. Kevin Warsh gets sworn in May 22nd. Big ceremony. Trump's right there promising rates are coming down very quickly. Five weeks later, Warsh's first FOMC meeting. held; rates stay right at three and a half to three and three quarters; unanimous twelve to zero!

ReaganAnd the dot plot flipped completely: Fox Business reported nine of eighteen officials are now projecting a rate hike, not a cut; in March not one of them penciled in a hike.

Rush LindellWow! Not one, zero, and now half the room wants to go higher. That's a full reversal in three months.

ReaganWhat changed? CPI hit four point two percent in May. A three-year high per CNBC. Energy-driven, tied directly to the Strait of Hormuz disruption that started February twenty eighth.

Rush LindellThe day the Iran war launched! See, that's the thesis of the whole show today: the Administration created the oil shock, the oil shock broke the inflation picture, and now the man they put in charge of the Fed can't give them what they asked

ReaganRight.

Rush Lindellfor!

ReaganAnd Warsh didn't even submit his own dot, refused to put a forecast in. CNBC flagged that before the meeting; he's also announced five task forces to overhaul how the Fed communicates and manages its balance sheet.

Rush LindellWe've also got a parody segment that practically writes itself, and Reagan will tell you why the joke lands harder than it should.

ReaganBecause the economics are real.

Rush LindellAnd we close on what Warsh walks into in the July twenty ninth meeting: a fragile cease fire, an IRGC cargo ship attack, and an October

Speaker 3twenty ninth meeting.

Rush LindellAnd October high cods climbing. First up, the setup. Before we dive in, a quick reminder. We love hearing from you. If you have questions or topics you'd like us to cover, head to the link in the description and submit your question. We read every single one. May twenty second, East Room of the White House, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas swears in Kevin Warsh as the new Fed chair. Trump steps to the mic and says, I want Kevin to be totally independent. Don't look at me. Don't look at anybody.

ReaganAnd then?

Rush LindellSame day, campaign rally in New York, Trump tells the crowd rates are coming down very quickly. You watch what's going to happen.

ReaganBoth things in the same day.

Rush LindellBoth things! One sentence says don't look at me; the next sentence says look at what I did. That's the whole set-up, Reagan—that's the con!

ReaganCNBC covered the ceremony, Warsh's exact words after the oath: he vowed to act with independence and resolve. He also said he did not promise rate cuts to get the nomination.

Rush LindellWhich give him credit for saying it out loud. Senate confirmed him fifty four to forty five. The thinnest margin for a Fed chair ever, and he walks in already having to prove he isn't Trump's guy.

ReaganRight, the confirmation fight was essentially a proxy war over whether the Fed stays independent. That shadow follows everything he does now.

Rush LindellSo, Trump fires Powell, effectively, installs his pick, throws a White House ceremony, tells a rally the cuts are coming, and then June seventeenth rolls around.

ReaganWarsh's first meeting as chair.

Rush LindellRates stay put three and a half to three point seven five per cent. Unanimous vote, and the dot plot nine of eighteen Fed officials now project a rate hike by year end.

ReaganWow.

Rush LindellNine!

ReaganThat's a full reversal from March, when the median projection was still pointing toward a cut.

Rush LindellSo Trump's guy held rates and the committee's leaning toward raising them. You know what nobody wants to say: Trump didn't get rate cuts; he might get the opposite.

ReaganThe question I'd push on: was that outcome ever actually avoidable, given the inflation picture Warsh inherited?

Rush LindellThat is exactly the question, and the dot plot is just the headline. What's inside those numbers tells a much darker story. So the dot plot is where this gets really concrete. CNBC reported the statement came in at just 130 words, down from 341 in April. No forward guidance. Warsh described it as a bit shorter, a bit simpler. Markets read that one signal and sold. Stocks down, short-term rates jumped, all from a statement shorter than most text messages. That's the whole story. The whole tell.

ReaganAnd the dot plot itself, 9 of 18 officials projecting a rate hike before year end. In March, the median was still calling for a cut. That's a complete reversal in one quarter.

Rush LindellA complete reversal,

ReaganYeah.

Rush LindellRight. So what changed between March and June?

ReaganCPI hit 4.2% in May, year over year. PCE came in at 4.1%. The Fed's own projections show total PCE running at 5%. running at 3.6% for the full year, those numbers leave no much wiggle room.

Rush LindellNone. And the Iran war started the last day of February. The Strait of Hormuz disruption roughly 20% of global oil supply. That's what drove energy prices. That's why CPI went from around

ReaganRight.

Rush Lindell2.4% in January to 4.2% by May.

ReaganThe Chase investment research team put it plainly: inflation in May was, quote, quote, primarily driven by rising energy, oil, and gas prices that began in March with the onset of the conflict. So this isn't a Fed ideology story.

Rush LindellNo, it is not. But here's what I want people sitting in their car right now to understand. You're paying more at the pump, your mortgage rate isn't moving, and the guy demanding rate cuts is the same guy who started the war that caused the price spike.

ReaganNow, Warsh also did something unusual at his press conference. He refused to submit his own Dot; sat out the forecast entirely; said it's consistent with his "long held views on the SEP Framework.

Rush LindellThe chair of the Federal Reserve won't tell you where he thinks rates are going. That's either principled, or it's...

ReaganStrategic ambiguity—both, probably—and with seventeen of eighteen officials saying inflation risks are tilted upward, the direction of pressure is obvious. Which brings us to the question nobody in the White House wants to answer.

Rush LindellWhich is, who actually created this problem? You know what nobody wants to say? Trump launched a war on February 28th. The Strait of Hormuz, one-fifth of global oil supply, gets choked off, Brent crude goes from $73 a barrel to over $100, and suddenly the Fed can't cut. That's not a monetary policy story. That's a foreign policy story that crashed a monetary policy meeting.

ReaganAnd the data backs that up. CNN fact-checked Trump's own inflation claims. CPI was 2.4% in January and February. In February, before the war, the Fed was penciling in a cut for twenty twenty six; that path was gone the moment the first strike happened.

Rush LindellGone. Completely." And the Dallas Fed put out a paper on this. They called the Strait disruption,

ReaganHow?

Rush Lindellthe largest geopolitical oil supply shock in history, two to three times bigger than nineteen seventy three. That's not a footnote, that's the whole cause.

ReaganNow I'd push back slightly. The war had national security justifications we can argue about, but the economic consequences don't care about the justification.

Rush LindellRight. The oil market is not moved by your foreign policy rationale; the oil market moves on supply, and supply got cut.

ReaganSo you've got a president who created the shock and then on Wednesday, CNBC reported this, he said quote, we need low interest rates. His own advisors have quietly stopped calling for near term cuts. Cuts, but Trump hasn't.

Rush LindellHe hasn't gotten the memo-or he's gotten it and doesn't care. Because here's the thing about this Administration: the political pressure doesn't follow the economic reality; it runs ahead of it.

ReaganAnd that puts Warsh in a genuinely impossible spot: he can't cut-inflation won't let him; he can't hike-without ...

Rush Lindellinfuriating the man who installed him.

ReaganExactly. And Trump has a very specific history with Fed chairs who ... To "don't deliver," ask Powell.

Rush LindellSo the question now isn't whether Warsh is independent, it's how long Trump lets him be. That's the conversation we need to have. So, while we're on the Powell parallel, I want to make that case directly. Trump picked Powell, praised Powell, then spent three years calling him a fool and threatening to fire him. Now he's got Warsh, and last Wednesday, Oval Office, same guy says low rates will solve everything, everything, the border, the deficit, your electric bill, low rates!

ReaganOkay, but Rush slow down for a second because Warsh is not Powell, and I think that distinction matters more than the parallel.

Rush LindellMake the case.

ReaganPowell never had Trump's actual trust. From day one, he was managing a president who resented him. Warsh starts with real political capital. CNBC reported that a White House official said Trump has confidence and faith in Warsh and that's changing the whole posture. Even Navarro walked back his cut calls.

Rush LindellOkay, I'll give you that; the relationship is different. But here's what gets me: it doesn't change the structural trap. Cut (you validate inflation), hike (you infuriate a President who just said rates solve everything). The trust buys him time: it does not buy him a way out. That's fair.

ReaganAnd look, And look, markets agree: CME FedWatch is pricing a seventy nine percent chance of a hike by December. Zero cuts. The patience from the White House is real, but it's not infinite.

Rush LindellTrump's patience infinite, right?

ReaganThe man does have a track record.

Rush LindellWhich brings us to what Warsh is actually doing inside the institution, because he's not just holding rates and waiting – he's shaping the whole operation. Five task forces, a new statement format – that's a different kind of move entirely. So, look, setting aside the rate drama for a second, what Warsh actually did at that first meeting is worth taking seriously on its own terms. Five task forces-communications, balance sheet, inflation framework, data sourcing, productivity, and jobs. According to CNBC's recap of the June 17th press conference, no Fed chair in recent history has launched anything this ambitious. And, Reagan, I'll give him that. Conservatives have wanted someone to attack that $6.7 trillion balance sheet for years. That thing ballooned from $800 billion to nearly $9 trillion, and nobody in Washington blinked.

ReaganRight. And dumping forward guidance? Serious monetary economists have argued for a decade that it boxes the Fed in. Warsh didn't just talk about it, he stripped it from the statement on day one.

Rush LindellDay one. very bold, very principled, and also none of it matters if Trump blows the relationship up in six months because rates are still at three and a half percent.

ReaganI mean, that's the tension.

Rush LindellThat's exactly the tension. The reform agenda is real. Warsh clearly believes it. But you're threading a needle between institutional overhaul and a president who went to a rally the same day he said totally independent and promised rates coming down very quickly.

ReaganThe question I keep coming back to is, is a central banker doing the job or a man building credibility so fast that he's hoping the political pressure doesn't catch up? CHAPTER FOUR THE REFORMS TAKE HOLD

Rush LindellBoth! the answer is both! He's buying himself cover with the reform optics while holding firm on rates-smart play, if it works.

ReaganAnd Warsh himself put it pretty plainly. CNBC quoted him saying the commitment to two per cent is strong, unanimous and unambiguous. That's not a man threatening anything-that's a man planting a flag.

Rush LindellSure, but here's what I want you to imagine. What does the political conversation actually sound like right now from the guy demanding cheap money while also running a war that's making everything expensive? Stay right there. All right, we're doing it-mock press conference time.

ReaganOh no.

Rush LindellMy fellow Americans, inflation is out of control. The Fed must cut rates immediately. Also, we're sending another carrier group to the Gulf.

ReaganThose two statements cannot coexist.

Rush LindellWrong-they coexist beautifully. Cheap money and bombs-that's leadership.

ReaganRight. See, here's what he's actually asking: Can you run wartime energy inflation at the same time as peacetime interest rates? The answer from any economist on earth is no.

Rush LindellDETAILS

ReaganThe Pentagon's own controller told the Senate Armed Services Committee that he could not close the books on the department's spending for the past year, because the books are in such a mess.

Speaker 3Services Committee in May that the Iran war had already run up $29 billion in operational costs,

Rush LindellWow.

Reaganand that number wasn't counting base repair in Kuwait and Bahrain.

Rush LindellYou cannot pump that kind of wartime spending into an oil-shocked economy and then demand the Fed hand you cheap credit on top. Okay,

Reaganbut I'm right though, right? That's exactly what's happening. That's exactly what's happening.

Rush LindellThat's the bit. The IEA called this the largest oil supply disruption in the history

Speaker 3of the United States.

Rush LindellIn the history of the global oil market, you've got wartime fiscal pressure, a closed Strait of Hormuz, inflation at four point two percent,

ReaganAnd

Rush Lindelland the demand is still cut rates.

Reaganthe Fed can't say that out loud. Warsh, without naming Trump, pointed to the Iran war as a key cause of high inflation. The Globe and Mail flagged that, without directly naming the president.

Rush LindellWith diplomatic dissemination.

ReaganMaximum polite. Anyway, the joke writes itself: You want peacetime rates, end the war.

Rush LindellAnd that's the part that's actually not funny. The contradiction is real: War can't cut because the conditions Trump created won't allow it, which is exactly where we're heading into July.

ReaganThe next FOMC meeting, and that one's going to matter a lot more than this one did. So here's what's waiting for Warsh on July twenty ninth, the next FOMC meeting, and the Strait situation just got messier: Iran's Revolutionary Guard struck a cargo ship last Thursday; the IMO paused its evacuation convoy; Trump said, and I'm quoting, "You're gonna find out," when asked about consequences; that's the geopolitical backdrop Warsh walks into.

Rush LindellAnd the market is already pricing that in. CME FedWatch as of today has roughly seven. Seventy per cent holding in July, but the hike probability by October, that number keeps moving in the wrong direction.

ReaganRight, so think about the trap: Warsh hikes, Trump blames the Fed; Warsh holds and inflation stays hot, Trump blames the Fed; the only exit ramp is if Hormuz fully stabilizes fast enough for let energy prices to fall on their own.

Rush LindellAnd there's an honest case for that. Core inflation was two point nine per cent in May. Hey, the underlying economy isn't running hot, it's the oil shock that's doing the damage. If the MOU holds and shipping resumes, that dynamic could shift before September.

ReaganExcept Iran shot a cargo ship last Thursday.

Rush LindellI know, I know, I'm steel manning it.

ReaganSteal away. But Reagan, every piece of the resolution is outside the Fed's control. The MOU language, per reporting from Time, is ambiguous enough that Iran can strike. strike and still claim compliance.

Rush LindellThat's the real problem: Warsh is making monetary policy decisions about an inflation shock he didn't cause, can't control, and can't fix. The Fed's only lever is demand; it can't reopen the Strait.

ReaganAnd that is the whole episode in one sentence. Trump started a war that broke oil markets, inflation followed, and now the guy Trump put in charge of the Fed gets to own the consequences. The July twenty-ninth meeting won't just test monetary policy. It tests whether the relationship survives contact with what actually happened.

Rush LindellThe economics don't care who's in the chair.

ReaganNo, they don't. And that's the problem nobody in the White House wants to say out loud. And that is where we leave it. Warsh walked into his first FOMC meeting holding a trap he didn't build, and now he's got until July twenty-ninth to figure out how to get out of it.

Rush LindellThe dot plot reversal said it all: nine of eighteen officials projecting a hike. That's not a hold, that's a warning.

ReaganAnd Trump called rates coming down very quickly same day—both things.

Rush LindellThe cease fire is fragile; the IRGC cargo ship attack just happened, there's no clean path here.

ReaganNone, and that's the story-a political trap built by the same administration that needed worse to succeed.

Rush LindellThanks for spending the hour with us.

ReaganIf this episode got you thinking, share it with someone who needs to hear it. Subscribe, leave us a five star review. It matters more than you know.

Rush LindellNew episodes every weekday. We'll see you back here tomorrow.

ReaganStay sharp!

Speaker 4S