Mato just raised pre-seed Read more

Nadia: The Verdict Arrives

  • Aug 25, 2026
  • 15 min

Show notes

What the episode covers

Nadia has just opened the YC decision email she has been waiting on for weeks, and in this episode you hear the exact moment she finds out if her company’s next year is completely rewritten. The stakes are simple and huge: either she’s in and locked into a YC batch, or she has to rebuild the plan she’s been working toward all summer.

You have to hear this one because Nadia reads the verdict out loud, processes it in real time, and immediately loops in her cofounder before she even lets herself react. From there, Miles and Grant bring the YC partner back on mic to break down what this outcome structurally changes for her next 90 days, and what the alternate path would have looked like if the answer had been no. Together they unpack what “useful feedback” really means, what founders who don’t get in actually do next, and how persistence shows up beyond the polished success stories, all through the lens of Year One decisions that compound. Published August 25, 2026, this episode is especially relevant if you’re anywhere near hitting submit on your own YC application.

Timeline

In this episode

7 moments worth skipping to. The timecodes match the player above.

  1. 0:00Introduction
  2. 0:57Four Episodes, One Deadline
  3. 3:39The Odds She Was Up Against
  4. 6:03The Email
  5. 9:07What Either Outcome Buys Her
  6. 11:48The Ones Who Heard No and Built Anyway
  7. 14:06Outro

Quick answers

Straight from the episode

The questions this one settles, without the listen.

What decision deadline did YC give Nadia, and how long did she have to wait for an answer?
YC gave Nadia an August 28 decision date, which meant roughly a ten-day window between submitting and finally hearing back on her application.
How does this episode handle Nadia’s YC verdict without dragging out the timeline?
The episode quickly moves from confirming the August 28 deadline and wait period into the actual decision, avoiding calendar rehash and focusing instead on what the outcome structurally changes for her next 90 days.
What happens in the moment Nadia finds out her YC result?
Nadia reads the YC email live, hesitates, then says “I’m in.” Her first move is calling her cofounder before reacting further, while the hosts process the news in real time with the audience.
According to the episode, what does a YC ‘yes’ change for a founder’s immediate future?
A yes commits a founder to a three‑month October–December YC program, starting with an in‑person San Francisco kickoff and culminating in a Fall 2026 Demo Day on December 2, reshaping their next 90 days around that schedule.
What does a YC ‘no’ still offer a founder, based on the partner’s perspective in the episode?
A no still gives a founder a partner’s pattern‑matching read on what to strengthen before reapplying—framed here as specific, usable feedback, especially valuable for someone who’s been building in public.
How does the episode treat stories of founders who were rejected from YC but later succeeded?
It highlights short-form clips about a founder rejected multiple times before building a huge company, not as verified fact but as a way to emphasize persistence and what founders do next, regardless of whether they got into YC.

Transcript

The full conversation

Every word of the episode, 2,796 of them, in the order they were said.

Read the transcriptHide the transcript

MilesI opened the email, and I read the first line four times before it actually landed.

GrantThat's Nadia. This morning, unedited.

MilesWe're not telling you which way it went yet.

GrantYou're getting it the way she got it, cold.

MilesMiles and Grant here. This is the show where we follow one founder through one decision, and today, we finally get to sit with Nadia after she knows, not before.

GrantFour weeks of speculating, and it ends today.

MilesJuly twenty-seventh, that's the day she hits submit on the Y Combinator Fall twenty twenty-six application.

GrantIn three days from when this episode was supposed to drop, the verdict lands in her inbox.

MilesWe've been tracking this thing like it's our own application.

GrantBecause it kinda is at this point. Four episodes on one deadline.

MilesThe odds, the wait, the... Honestly, some of the worst weeks of her year from what she's told us.

GrantSo no more guessing from us today. We play the tape, we bring the partner back one more time, and then we go back and lay out exactly how this month was built. The deadline, the decision date, all of it.

MilesBecause right now, all you know is she opened an email. Okay, so we've been treating this whole month like a black box, but there's one piece of it that's not speculation at all.

GrantWhich piece?

MilesYC's own account tweeted the reminder themselves the night before everything closed. No ambiguity, no secondhand account of it.

GrantStraight from the source.

MilesRight. They posted it themselves. The actual cutoff, eight PM Pacific, on the record.

GrantWhich matters because half of what we've said this month has been us reading tea leaves.

MilesExactly. This part isn't a tea leaf.

GrantSo the deadline's locked. What about the other end of it?

MilesThat's the part I actually wanna sit with. One write-up on the cycle laid out the math. If you get your application in on time, the decision lands in your inbox by August twenty-eighth.

GrantThat's a specific date to be staring at your phone for.

MilesIt is. That's the actual day.

GrantAnd that's the day we're talking about right now, this episode.

MilesYep.

GrantOkay, so walk me through where we've actually been because I feel like we've circled this from, like, four different angles.

MilesFair. We opened with the scramble to the deadline. Then we spent an entire episode just on the waiting. What? Ten days of nothing? Just refreshing.

GrantTen days of silence is brutal for a founder.

MilesIt is. And now we're at the part where the silence ends.

GrantWhich is the part nobody can fake their way through.

MilesNow, you can prep for the wait. You can't prep for what the email actually says.

GrantI keep coming back to how weirdly specific that whole month has been. A deadline nobody outside our co-founder knew about, a decision date locked to the day, and then just silence in between.

MilesThat's the part that gets me, too. It's not like a court date where you get updates along the way. It's just quiet and then one email.

GrantWhich is why we kept coming back to it episode after episode. There wasn't new information most weeks. There was just her living inside the wait.

MilesRight. And that's worth naming before we move on. The last three episodes weren't plotting. They were tracking what actually happens to a person during a month like that.

GrantSo before we get to what she was actually up against odds-wise, anything else on the calendar mechanics we haven't nailed down?

MilesNo. I think that's the whole shape of it. Deadlines confirmed, decision dates confirmed, and the only unknown left is what was inside the email.

GrantWhich is exactly where we're headed.

MilesOkay, so we know the calendar. What we haven't talked about is how thin that inbox actually was.

GrantThin how?

MilesA site called We Are Founders crunched the numbers on this cycle, and Summer Twenty Twenty-Five landed at a record low point six percent acceptance rate.

GrantPoint six.

MilesPoint six. Not one and a half, not two, the number everybody quotes on Twitter, point six.

GrantSo out of a thousand applicants, six get in.

MilesSix.

GrantThat's not a filter. That's a needle.

MilesAnd it didn't bounce back. Winter twenty twenty-six funded around a hundred and ninety-six companies, and that vouch landed closer to one percent.

GrantWhich sounds like an improvement.

MilesIt's still one in a hundred.

GrantRight. Right. Okay, so Nadia wasn't just up against a hard test. She was up against a test that's gotten harder every cycle.

MilesThat's the frame.

GrantI keep thinking about how much prep goes into an application like that, and the odds don't care.

MilesThey never do. But here's a number that actually cuts the other way.

GrantI could use one.

MilesA Stanford finance professor, Ilya Strebulaev, writes a newsletter on this stuff, and he pointed out that roughly half of the companies that eventually get into YC had applied more than once before they got a yes.

GrantHalf?

MilesHalf.

GrantSo a no this cycle wouldn't have meant no forever.

MilesThat's... Okay, that actually matters for how we think about whatever she opened in that email.

GrantIt does. Because for Nadia specifically, this isn't her first swing at building something investors take seriously. She's been grinding on unit economics, customer interviews, the whole build for months on this show.

MilesSo even a no isn't a verdict on the company.

GrantIt's a verdict on one cycle against odds that were, what, one in a hundred at best? Which almost makes either outcome feel less binary than we've been treating it.

MilesExactly. And that's the thing I keep landing on when I think about her specifically. She didn't walk into this cold. She had a working product, actual customers she could point to, months of us watching her tighten the pitch.

GrantWhich is more than a lot of applicants can say.

MilesRight. So if the numbers say one in a hundred for a random applicant, Nadia was never a random applicant. She was doing everything the odds reward.

GrantDoesn't guarantee anything, though.

MilesNo. Nothing guarantees anything at point six percent. But it's the difference between someone who got unlucky at a hard game and someone who never learned the rules.

GrantFair. But odds and precedent are one thing.

MilesYeah.

GrantThey don't tell you what's actually sitting in her inbox right now.

MilesNo, they really don't.

GrantOkay. So-

MilesThis is the part we've all been wielding toward.

GrantYeah. No more math, no more percentages, just her opening the email.

MilesWe got the audio back late last night.

GrantI've listened to it probably 10 times already.

MilesSame.

GrantThere's a stretch where she doesn't say anything for, I wanna say four, five seconds.

MilesLong time when you're just sitting with someone.

GrantWe kept it in the edit, didn't cut it.

MilesYou can hear her breathing change before she even says a word.

GrantAnd then she reads it out loud to herself first.

MilesUnder her breath.

GrantLike she's checking it's real before she tells us anything.

MilesThen she looks up, and she says it plain, "I'm in."

GrantSay that again? "I'm in." That's the line, word for word.

MilesOkay. Okay, wow.

GrantYeah.

MilesI've sat across from founders getting news, good and bad, and there's usually a beat where they're performing the reaction a little, even without meaning to.

GrantNot here.

MilesNot here. She just kind of exhales, sits back.

GrantAnd then she laughs, this short laugh, and says she has to call her co-founder before she does anything else.

MilesWhich honestly tells you everything about how she's wired.

GrantThe company comes before the celebration.

MilesRight. Even in the moment she got the thing she's been chasing for a month, her first move is a phone call to the person who's been in it with her.

GrantWe didn't script a reaction for this. We genuinely didn't know which way it was gonna go when we sat down with her.

MilesNeither did we sitting on our side of it.

GrantI had guesses.

MilesYou had guesses that changed every episode.

GrantFair.

MilesI've had my own version of that email years ago. You never fully forget the sound of your own voice reading it back to yourself.

GrantWhat'd yours say?

MilesThat's a different episode. Point is, the flatness in her voice right before she says it, that's not nerves, that's disbelief.

GrantYou can hear her catch herself. Like she reads it, stops, rereads the same line.

MilesMaking sure it's not a rejection dressed up as good news.

GrantWhich happens more than people think. Vague wording, they misread it the wrong way for a second.

MilesNot this time, though. No confusion once she says it out loud.

GrantBut hearing, "I'm in" lands differently than reading a percentage on a spreadsheet.

MilesIt's a person's actual life turning on one word.

GrantAnd now she's got batch dates, onboarding, a whole set of problems she didn't have yesterday.

MilesWhich is a different show than the one we'd have made if that email had said no.

GrantSame email, same day, two completely different next 90 days.

MilesAnd that's not a small distinction. That's the shape of what happens to her company from here.

GrantThe co-founder call alone. Think about what that conversation sounds like on the other end.

MilesSomebody picking up the phone with no idea what's coming.

GrantAnd 30 seconds later, their whole roadmap just changed.

MilesWhich is exactly why we didn't wanna guess at any of this ourselves.

GrantWe asked the partner to come back and walk us through what actually opens up for her now.

MilesSo if it's a yes, and it is a yes, the partner walks Nadia through what that actually buys her on the calendar.

GrantWhich is?

MilesYC's own blog has Fall 2026 Demo Day locked for Wednesday, December 2nd. That's the fixed point everything else gets built backwards from.

GrantDecember 2nd. Okay.

MilesYeah, that's not a vibe. That's a date on a calendar with investors already planning to show up.

GrantAnd the stretch between now and then?

MilesThe program itself runs roughly October through December, three months, and it kicks off in person in San Francisco.

GrantSo she's packing a bag.

MilesShe's packing a bag. Whatever city she's building in right now, she's got a kickoff to get to.

GrantThree months is not a long runway to go from where she is to standing on a stage in December.

MilesNo, it isn't, and that's exactly the pressure the partner leans on. The clock doesn't wait for her to feel ready.

GrantOkay. But that's the me version. What does the partner say when it's not a yes?

MilesThat's the harder conversation, honestly.

GrantBecause there's no Demo Day to point at?

MilesRight. There's no fixed date, no kickoff flight to book. The partner's whole job in that room is pattern matching. Has this founder, this idea, this team seen this fork before?

GrantAnd we already know from the numbers earlier that plenty of the founders who eventually got funded had sat exactly where a rejected Nadia would be sitting.

MilesExactly. So the partner's read isn't go away. It's here's what you build in the meantime so the next swing is stronger.

GrantPush back on me here. Is that pattern matching actually useful, or is it just a nicer way of saying try again?

MilesI think it's useful because it's specific to the founder, not a form letter. The partner's not telling every rejected applicant the same thing. They're looking at what's actually weak in the pitch, the traction, the team, and pointing at exactly that.

GrantSo it's less good luck next time and more here's the one thing to fix before you resubmit.

MilesRight. And for someone like Nadia, who's been building in public with us this whole month, that feedback loop is actually usable. She'd know exactly what to work on for the next cycle instead of guessing.

GrantWhich is a completely different kind of 90 days. One's got a plane ticket and a whiteboard with December circled. The other's got no external deadline at all.

MilesNo deadline, no stage, no cohort of people also freaking out in a group chat with you.

GrantThat's a lonelier version of the same three months.

MilesIt is. And that's the shape of what changes on paper. A date, a flight, a room full of other founders versus none of that.

GrantThe harder question is what it actually does to the founders who don't get the yes. Not the calendar, them.

MilesYeah. That's where we're headed next. So while we were waiting on Nadia's inbox, I went down a rabbit hole on my phone.

GrantUh-oh. What kind of rabbit hole?

MilesThere's this whole cluster of short clips going around right now, founders talking about getting turned down by YC over and over.

GrantHow over and over are we talking?

MilesOne account keeps surfacing with the same claim, six rejections, then they built what the caption calls a massive company.

GrantSix times. And nobody names the company.

MilesNot once. Not in that clip, not in the couple others riffing on the same line.

GrantWait, there's more than one?

MilesThere's a whole little genre of it now. Same six rejections number, different creator, different edit.

GrantThat number's doing a lot of work with zero receipts behind it.

MilesRight. Nobody verifies the figure. Nobody says what the company even does. It's just the shape of the story people wanna repeat.

GrantBecause the shape is good. Rejected, rejected, rejected, then huge.

MilesExactly. And it travels because it's satisfying, not because anyone checked it.

GrantHmm. It's funny hearing that the same week we've got an actual person, actual verdict sitting right in front of us.

MilesThat's what got me thinking about her, honestly.

GrantNadia's not six for six on anything. She's one data point.

MilesOne real data point beats a dozen viral ones with no name attached.

GrantSo what do you actually take from those clips if the number's unverifiable?

MilesNot the number, the pattern underneath it. People who kept applying instead of deciding one no meant the idea was dead.

GrantThat part tracks with what we already know about how many funded founders had been through this more than once.

MilesRight. And Nadia already showed us that instinct, too, prepping for months, not treating this like a single roll of dice.

GrantThe difference is she got her answer on camera. Those creators are telling you the ending years later, after it's safe to package.

MilesWhich is a totally different thing than sitting with the actual uncertainty in real time.

GrantSo if she'd heard no today, would you want her chasing the six rejections version of the story?

MilesI'd want her chasing the part where you keep building regardless of what the story ends up sounding like later.

GrantBecause right now, nobody's writing her caption yet.

MilesNobody's writing it for a while. She's just living the next ninety days of it.

GrantWhich brings us right back to her, doesn't it? Whichever way that verdict landed.

MilesYeah. Let's go find out where that actually leaves her. So that's it. Nadia's in the batch.

GrantFour episodes, and now she's just a founder in a cohort.

MilesWhich is the weirdest part, right? All that waiting, and the ending is just a normal Tuesday for her now.

GrantA very good Tuesday.

MilesA very good Tuesday.

GrantWe started this thing chasing a deadline nobody outside her co-founder even knew about. Now she's got a cohort, a calendar, a partner assigned to her.

MilesAnd somewhere out there is a version of Nadia who got the other no. We didn't get to sit with her this time.

GrantNo. But everything the partner told us about the no still applies to somebody listening right now.

MilesThat's kind of the whole point of doing this show, honestly. Not just her outcome, the mechanics underneath it.

GrantMhm.

MilesIf you're a founder in your first year and you're sitting with a decision like this one, good, bad, still pending, write to us.

Grantyearone@heymatto.com. We read everything that comes in.

MilesWe might even put you on the show.

GrantNo promises on the ending being as clean as Nadia's.

MilesRight. Hers could have gone either way, and we'd run the same episode.

GrantThat was the deal from day one.

MilesIf this arc was useful to you, if watching one company go through the whole thing start to finish told you something about your own timeline, leave us a review.

GrantIt actually helps more than people think. It's how the next founder finds the show before their own deadline hits.

MilesI keep thinking about her calling her co-founder before she even told us.

GrantYeah.

MilesThat's the part I'll remember. Not the acceptance, the phone call.

GrantCongratulations, Nadia.

More episodes

Keep listening

Other episodes of Year One, newest first.

All episodes of Year One

Sources

Where this came from

9 reports behind the episode. Every one of them opens where it was published.