Mato just raised pre-seed Read more
Podcast charts
Published by Kari LaMotte
Field notes on clarity, leadership, and systems in transition. About learning to see clearly, think structurally, and navigate complexity with coherence. notes.theaperturefield.com
On the charts
Every published chart this podcast appears in, in the snapshot behind this page. Each one links to the chart it came off.
The Mato Topic Intelligence Platform does not report this podcast as charting in a published category in this snapshot.
From the feed
The latest episodes published to this podcast’s own RSS feed. Titles and descriptions are the publisher’s.
How do we build a more regenerative, sustainable future when the hardest challenge is not the technology, but how we talk, listen, and decide together? In this conversation, we explore the posture needed for difficult conversations about collective change. From infrastructure and co-design to power, truth, empathy, and belonging, we consider how communities can move beyond polarized camps without erasing real differences. We discuss: * Why innovation adoption is a relational challenge, not only a technical one * “Strong spine, open heart” as a posture for holding conviction and curiosity together * What meaningful co-design requires beyond a stakeholder checklist * How power imbalances can shape who gets heard—and how facilitation can create more equitable space * The difference between facts, interpretations, and feelings in a challenging conversation * Why belonging to the shared work may matter as much as belonging to a particular side The guiding idea is simple but demanding: each of us may hold an essential piece of truth, but none of us holds the whole. What would change if we entered difficult conversations not to win, but to create a space where something better can emerge? This is a space where ideas are explored in real time. Subscribe at notes.theaperturefield.com to follow the threads as they begin to connect, and follow on your favourite podcast platform. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
What can plants teach us about progress? In this first Conversations with Mica , Kari LaMotte thinks alongside Mica, an AI conversational partner, about seeds, stems, leaves, and the quieter work that allows a living system to renew itself. Beginning with the seasonal life of plants, Kari and Mica explore a wider question: what happens when a society becomes skilled at growth and innovation, but less practiced at integrating, maintaining, and renewing what it creates? Their conversation moves through photosynthesis, raspberry canes, pruning, compost, polarization, and the value of fragmentation. Along the way, they consider how specialization can create both essential knowledge and disconnection. and why the next human task may be learning to translate between perspectives without losing their depth. This is not a conversation seeking a finished answer. It is an invitation to stay with a live question: how might we build systems that can grow, adapt, and regenerate as a whole? Please continue the conversation below and add your own perspective! If you enjoyed this podcast, please follow on the podcast platform of your choice. I am most interested in your own perspective on these questions, and invite you to comment and subscribe below to follow the thread.. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
In this piece, I begin with what initially seemed like an obvious principle: recognizing the Indigenous nation whose territory it is as the host nation and genuine co-founder of any new community. But an uncomfortable question emerged: If one people remains the host forever, does everyone else remain a guest forever? This reflection explores whether historical repair can protect the depth of Indigenous belonging without making future belonging impossible. It considers belonging as something that can be inherited, and also something that must be cultivated through responsibility, participation and care for the land. Ideas explored - The difference between ceremonial recognition and genuine co-founding - Consent, co-founding and shared inheritance - Whether people can become true stewards while remaining perpetual visitors - The difference between Indigenous identity and an authentic relationship with place - The danger of romanticizing Indigenous peoples as humanity’s designated land stewards - Learning across knowledge systems without extracting or erasing them - Land as an enduring participant rather than property changing owners - Whether historical repair needs a destination beyond permanent creditor-and-debtor roles - Creating a shared future without using equality to erase history Questions to carry forward - At what point does a guest become part of a place? - Can belonging be cultivated without appropriating another people’s identity? - How do we protect what must remain distinct while allowing something genuinely shared to emerge? - What would our communities look like if stewardship were part of belonging? - Can we remember that our beginnings were unequal without making inequality of belonging permanent? This is an incomplete thought offered in the hope that it generates conversations needed for a more promising tomorrow. I welcome your perspective through your own lens as we collectively navigate this tricky terrain.Visit Substack for the original article and others at notes.theaperturefield.com Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
In this episode, I reflect on artificial intelligence as part of a much larger pattern of technological change. New technologies have always arrived with a mixture of possibility and fear. Railways, electric light, telephones, automobiles, television, computers, and the internet all disrupted the world people knew. Many of the concerns they raised were valid. But the deepest changes were rarely limited to what the technology itself could do. The automobile didn't simply replace the horse, it reorganized cities, work, infrastructure, commerce, and everyday life. I believe AI may represent a similar threshold. Most current conversations focus on first-order questions: - Will AI replace jobs? - Will people stop thinking? - Will truth become harder to find? - Will AI become dangerous? These questions matter. But they may not be the whole story. The deeper question I explore here is: What happens when human thinking gains a new environment in which to unfold? Many leaders, founders, researchers, advisors, and changemakers are not short of intelligence or ideas. They are short of cognitive room. They are trying to hold complexity, relationships, competing needs, history, uncertainty, and possibility all at once. Used carefully, AI can become a place to externalize that complexity. It can help us hold multiple threads, identify patterns, test assumptions, translate across disciplines, and see the structure of what we are carrying. The purpose isn't to hand our thinking over to a machine, it is to create more room for human judgment, discernment, connection, and action. This is the thinking behind AI as a Thinking Partner , my six-week small-group course for people working with real complexity. The course is not primarily about prompts, software, or productivity. It is a practice for learning how to use AI to: - externalize difficult or unfinished thinking; - find patterns within complex material; - explore questions without rushing toward answers; - pressure-test decisions and assumptions; - translate ideas into useful structures; and develop a personal way of working with AI that strengthens human agency. I am currently gathering interest for upcoming cohorts. Learn more through the link in the episode description, or reply and tell me about the complexity, change, or possibility you are trying to hold. Perhaps the future will not be shaped only by those who learn how to make AI produce more. Perhaps it will also be shaped by those who learn how to create more room.Learn more here: https://notes.theaperturefield.com/s/ai-as-a-thinking-partner Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
What if purpose is not something we find, but something that becomes available when our lives align with who we are? In this essay, I explore the difference between purpose as self-sacrifice and purpose as coherent participation. For a long time, I confused being useful with reducing my own ability to simply be in service of something greater. But I’m beginning to wonder whether that frame is backwards. Perhaps our deeper work is not to become heroic, indispensable, or sacrificial, but to let the pattern of our living come into alignment with the pattern of our being. Through the lens of the aperture, this piece reflects on clarity, coherence, availability, and what it means to participate in the evolution of a system without distorting ourselves in the process. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
What makes a neighbourhood? Through reflections on three very different communities (a prairie farming town, Vancouver’s Commercial Drive, and life in a dense urban neighbourhood) I explore how community changes as the places we live change. As our cities evolve, so do the ways we connect, belong, and care for one another. Perhaps the greatest challenge of our time is learning to listen across different lived experiences while still finding ways to build community together. I’d love to hear your own experiences: What makes a neighbourhood feel like home to you?The full essay can be found on Substack --> notes.theaperturefield.com Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
I recently found myself reflecting on one of my earliest attempts at empathy. As a child, I once gave my younger sister a birthday gift that consisted of the contents of my bedside drawer: a worn charm necklace, a collection of charms, and some fake money. I was thrilled with my own thoughtfulness. She was… less impressed. Looking back, I’ve come to realize that the lesson wasn’t about gift-giving. It was about perspective. At that age, I was trying to care for someone else using the only map I had available: my own. Over time, I learned to understand other people’s worlds more deeply. I became fascinated with empathy, relationships, and the ways people make sense of their experiences. Later, Carl Jung’s work introduced another layer: the idea that our strongest reactions often contain information about ourselves. But eventually I discovered that understanding myself wasn’t enough either. In this episode, I explore the relationship between empathy, projection, shadow work, trauma, and boundaries. I share why I think many discussions of projection have become overly simplified, and why true integration may require holding three things at once: 1) My reaction contains information about me. 2) Their behaviour contains information about them. 3) The interaction contains information about the relationship. We often talk about healing as learning to understand ourselves. We sometimes talk about compassion as learning to understand others. But perhaps maturity asks something more difficult: learning to hold both simultaneously. Topics explored: - Childhood lessons in empathy- Carl Jung and projection- Shadow work beyond simple projection- Trauma and emotional triggers- Restoring dimensionality in relationships- Compassion without self-abandonment- Boundaries rooted in understanding rather than condemnation A reflection on what happens when we stop asking only, “What’s wrong with them?” or “What’s wrong with me?” and begin asking what the relationship itself might be trying to show us. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
Systems move through rhythms. Growth, consolidation, release, renewal. Yet culturally, we often treat any pause, slowdown, or restructuring as failure rather than recognizing it as part of how living systems evolve. In this reflection, I explore the cyclical nature of progress, from the seasons themselves to the long arcs of societal transformation, and consider whether we may be standing not at the end of progress, but at the end of a particular phase of it. What if this moment is asking less for relentless expansion, and more for integration, maturation, and renewal? Field Notes is an ongoing exploration of the patterns, tensions, and transitions shaping the world around us, and within us. You can continue the conversation and find more reflections at The Aperture Field on Substack. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
I have been spending serious time lately considering the role of empathy and emotional intelligence in the world today. Like many, I find myself astonished by what I’m seeing across the world - acts that seem to disregard the very principles we have spent centuries developing as a human species. In my curiosity, I’ve been returning to the works of thinkers from the past, reading their original texts (there is no shortage of material here), from The Theory of Moral Sentiments to more modern works like Integrity , and of course Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ , which helped bring the language of ‘EQ’ into the mainstream As I followed the thread, I kept discovering something interesting: not only are these thinkers describing similar underlying dynamics through different lenses, but we have in fact, been circling these ideas for thousands of years. Empathy isn’t a new concept, it’s something continually rediscovered, reinterpreted, and renamed. And yet, despite this long lineage of thought, it feels as though we have lost something.. perhaps our shared internal picture of what these ideas actually mean in practice. Each work I return to offers another fragment of that image that feels both familiar and strangely absent in how we engage with one another today. So I’ve decided to follow that thread more deliberately. This series is an attempt to piece together connections across centuries of thought and tradition, to revisit texts and ideas that have in many cases been reduced to soundbites or dismissed as outdated, and to see whether something essential may have been left behind in the process. Some of the authors I’ll be exploring may be surprising, as often what they are remembered for today captures only a fraction of what they were actually trying to articulate. I'm very interested in hearing your own reflections as this unfolds, whether they align, challenge, or take the conversation somewhere unexpected. So, with that, consider this an open exploration into the deeper question of how we perceive, relate to, and make sense of one another individually, collectively, and within an increasingly complex world. What I can’t yet reconcile is why something so persistent keeps getting lost.. I suspect that’s where this needs to go next… Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
This is a short audio reflection drawn from a recent piece exploring a subtle shift in how we relate to inclusion, systems, and change. After spending time with a group of senior women leaders and reading a piece by Katrina C. Foster, I found myself sitting with a different kind of question.. not only why it is changing, but on why it feels like the signal is becoming harder to see. In this reflection, I trace a pattern I’ve encountered over time: How ideas emerge, become systems, and then slowly lose coherence as their form remains but their underlying signal thins. I'm not adding another take on what should happen next, but I am instead attempting to make visible the moment we may be in: between systems, where the old is losing legitimacy, and the new has not yet fully formed. You can read the full written piece here at The Aperture Field on Substack . Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
This is the audio version of the essay: The Villainous Hero You can read the written version here: https://notes.theaperturefield.com/p/the-villainous-hero The Aperture Field Notes are reflections on clarity, leadership, and systems in transition, exploring how people and organizations navigate complexity, change, and decision-making. More at: https://notes.theaperturefield.com Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
This is the audio version of the essay: The Cost of Veiled Communication You can read the written version here: https://notes.theaperturefield.com/p/the-cost-of-veiled-communication The Aperture Field Notes are reflections on clarity, leadership, and systems in transition; exploring how people and organizations navigate complexity, change, and decision-making. More at: https://notes.theaperturefield.com Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
Welcome to The Aperture Field Notes - audio essays and reflections on clarity, leadership, and systems in transition. These recordings are the audio versions of written field notes published at: https://notes.theaperturefield.com The Aperture Field is a strategy and systems advisory practice focused on helping leaders and organizations find clarity, improve decision-making, and navigate complex transitions. This publication is a place to think out loud about what works, what doesn’t, and why; across organizations, technology, society, and leadership. - Kari LaMotte The Aperture Field Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
In this episode, Kari explores the quiet pressure that can emerge when joy becomes a measure of success, alignment, purpose, or awakening. Joy is beautiful. Joy is welcome. But when it becomes the emotional state we are expected to maintain, life can start to narrow around a subtle form of optimization. Instead of meeting experience as it is, we begin ranking moments by how joyful they feel. This reflection asks what gets lost when joy becomes the metric. Drawing on the parable of the Zen Farmer, Kari considers the difference between emotional suppression and non-attachment. A non-attached orientation does not flatten feeling. It allows joy, grief, care, tenderness, disappointment, uncertainty, and stillness to move through without being held longer than they need to be. The episode also brings this lens into leadership, where many people are carrying complexity, responsibility, and uncertainty inside systems that cannot be fixed by positivity. In that context, the goal may not be brighter emotion, but greater coherence. Joy is not rejected here. It is returned to its proper place: one part of the whole emotional colour spectrum. A quiet episode about presence, non-attachment, leadership, and the freedom of letting life move through us without unnecessary friction. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe
Ranking source
Apple Podcasts rankings via the Mato Topic Intelligence Platform.
Observed September 11, 2026. Cached outside the daily freshness window; the positions keep the date they were taken on.
Apple and Apple Podcasts are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.
Pairs with
Bring this source into Mato to read its transferable patterns, then turn them into an original show for your own audience.