Published by Best Of Three Productions
Alvin and friends discuss a wide variety of tennis topics, both on and off the court.
Listen on Apple PodcastsMatt Futterman joins Best of Three to discuss The Cruelest Game , his book on the hidden cost of chasing greatness in professional tennis. The conversation centers on why tennis exposes players so completely: the solitude of competition, the weekly structure of losing, and the pressure placed on young stars before they are fully formed adults. Novak Djokovic emerges as the episode’s central model. Not simply because of what he has won, but because of how often he has rebuilt himself across eras. From Sinner studying his game to Alcaraz studying his practice habits and Coco Gauff studying his return patterns, Djokovic functions as the clearest blueprint for survival at the top of modern tennis. The discussion also explores Madison Keys learning to play with permission to lose, Naomi Osaka returning to a changed WTA, Ben Shelton’s gap between athleticism and tennis literacy, and the larger challenge facing the next generation: talent is not enough unless it can keep evolving. Order 'The Cruelest Game' here: https://www.mattfutterman.com/the-cruelest-game Send us Fan Mail
American tennis is often judged by outcomes at the professional level, but the more important question begins much earlier: how are young players actually learning the sport? In this episode, Alvin and Torrey examine whether the U.S. development model teaches juniors how to hit shots before it teaches them how to play tennis. Using American soccer as a parallel, the conversation explores how youth sports in the U.S. often become formalized, expensive, and parent-managed before they become culturally embedded. The hosts contrast that with environments where kids grow up around local clubs, informal play, walls, pickup games, and daily exposure to the sport. The episode sharpens around academy tennis: should serious development tracks be something families can buy into, or something players must earn through commitment, competitiveness, and ownership? The central distinction is simple but important — many kids play tennis, but fewer become tennis players. Send us Fan Mail
Wimbledon remains the sport’s most sacred stage, but this episode asks whether it is still the cleanest measure of tennis greatness. Grass demands a specialized version of the game: short points, first-strike precision, elite returning, low-contact movement, and the ability to hold focus when one lapse can decide a set. That lens leads directly to Jannik Sinner. Patrick and Alvin discuss why Sinner’s game may be uniquely suited to Wimbledon, not because grass reveals the full sport, but because it amplifies his most punishing qualities. The conversation also places Alexander Zverev’s recent surge in context, separating him from the wider field while keeping him a tier below Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz. The episode closes by widening the frame: Felix Auger-Aliassime as a player whose tennis may still exceed his late-stage belief, and the women’s game as a case study in the difference between tennis excellence and tennis marketability. Send us Fan Mail
Jannik Sinner’s Wimbledon final win over Alexander Zverev was not a simple case of one player overwhelming the other. Zverev produced one of his most assertive performances of the season, playing higher in the court, committing more fully to his forehand, and attacking with clearer purpose than he has for much of the year. The problem was what happened after that first wave. Sinner’s serve remained nearly untouchable, his return pressure slowly tightened around Zverev’s service games, and his baseline tempo forced Zverev to keep repeating a level that is still difficult for him to sustain. The match became less about whether Zverev had improved — he clearly had — and more about whether that improvement can survive against a player as complete and repeatable as Sinner. Alvin and Torrey also discuss Andy Roddick’s commentary, the coaching challenge of returning against elite servers, and the broader question of whether the grass-court season deserves more room on the tennis calendar. Send us Fan Mail
Linda Noskova’s Wimbledon final win over Karolina Muchova was not simply a breakthrough result. It was a clear signal that the younger WTA generation is arriving faster than expected, and that Noskova’s power-based game already carries the structure of a top-five player. Alvin and Torrey break down the final through the tactical tension between Noskova’s direct first-strike pressure and Muchova’s all-court variety. The key was time: Noskova’s serve, weight of shot, and court position repeatedly prevented Muchova from accessing her slice, drop shots, and net skills until she first began driving through the court with enough pace to neutralize the exchange. The episode also expands into the wider WTA landscape, where players like Noskova, Mirra Andreeva, Coco Gauff, Diana Shnaider, and Victoria Mboko are compressing the field from the top down. The hosts close with brief thoughts on Novak Djokovic’s semifinal loss to Jannik Sinner and Alexander Zverev’s opportunity in the Wimbledon final. Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/bIpMLVtTEAo , listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts, and follow @bestofthreepodcast on Instagram. Send us Fan Mail
Coco Gauff’s Wimbledon semifinal loss to Karolina Muchova revealed more progress than regression. Her serve was stable, her net game translated well to grass, and her willingness to move forward gave her a real path through the match. But the defining question remains whether the forehand can become a shot she actively builds around in the moments that decide championships. Muchova deserves equal credit for how she shaped the match. By blocking returns, playing through the middle, and forcing Coco into uncomfortable forehand decisions, she removed rhythm and made the match less about clean patterns and more about problem-solving under pressure. The episode also turns to Linda Noskova, whose rise is framed not as a sudden Wimbledon breakthrough but as the continuation of a steady top-ten trajectory. Her serve, touch, and composure fit into a larger Czech tennis identity built on variety, feel, and intelligent grass-court play. Send us Fan Mail
Arthur Fery’s Wimbledon run has become more than a home story. His win over Flavio Cobolli showed enough baseline quality, backhand stability, serving discipline, and crowd management to make the run feel earned rather than accidental. But the episode stays measured: Fery is not suddenly a finished top-tier player. The real question is whether this level can travel beyond the perfect conditions of Wimbledon, especially with Alexander Zverev waiting as the first true power-server test of the run. Alvin and Torrey also break down Zverev’s tactical evolution, including his second-serve confidence, down-the-line aggression, and improved willingness to move forward. On the women’s side, Linda Noskova and Marta Kostyuk are framed as players entering a separation phase: no longer prospects in theory, but major-stage players being asked to prove it under pressure. Send us Fan Mail
Novak Djokovic’s five-set Wimbledon quarterfinal win over Felix Auger-Aliassime was not simply another example of Djokovic surviving late in a Slam. It was a measuring match. Felix showed real top-tier growth: the backhand held up, the serve remained a weapon, and the forehand looked more like an attacking upgrade than a way to protect a weakness. But Djokovic remains the player who exposes whether that growth is complete. As the match tightened, he repeatedly challenged Felix’s patterns, especially the predictable inside-out forehand, and forced him to prove he could stay patient without searching for shortcuts. The fifth-set breaker became the clearest separation point: Felix had played like a contender for more than five hours, but Djokovic still managed the match like the standard. The episode also turns to Coco Gauff’s grass-court evolution after her win over Jessica Pegula. Coco is beginning to show a more aggressive version of herself on grass, built around a bigger serve, more purposeful net play, and growing trust in the forehand. The discussion closes with Gauff-Muchova, Naomi Osaka’s exit, and the tactical shape of the women’s draw. Send us Fan Mail
Coco Gauff’s Wimbledon run has shifted the conversation around her forehand. The stroke is not fully solved, but it is becoming more specific in its vulnerabilities and more useful in point construction. Alvin and Torrey break down why her win over Belinda Bencic showed real progress: more height, more spin, better resets, and a clearer path toward turning a pressured wing into a tactical asset. The next test is Jessica Pegula, whose flatter ball and grass-court instincts are well suited to challenge Coco below the strike zone. The matchup becomes a clean measure of whether Coco’s improvement can hold up against an elite player who knows exactly where to direct pressure. The episode also examines Naomi Osaka’s win over Aryna Sabalenka, led by serving and first-strike control, and looks ahead to Osaka’s contrast with Karolina Muchova. On the men’s side, Felix Auger-Aliassime’s five-set win sets up a meaningful confidence test against Novak Djokovic in a Grand Slam setting. Send us Fan Mail
Wimbledon is beginning to separate players who can solve matches with a full toolkit from players still trying to impose baseline patterns on grass. Alvin and Torrey frame the third round around that tension, using Grigor Dimitrov as the clearest example of why slice, touch, forward movement, serving patterns, and tactical variety still matter at the All England Club. The episode also examines Iga Swiatek’s loss to Alex Eala as a question of tactical identity rather than talent. Swiatek’s grass-court challenges are discussed through forehand uncertainty, indecision, and a lack of consistent forward pressure, while Eala’s timing and backhand quality are credited as real match-winning tools. From there, the conversation widens to Aryna Sabalenka’s consistency in a volatile women’s field, Amanda Anisimova’s loss to Madison Keys, and the depth of the men’s tour. Dimitrov, Safiullin, Bublik, Fritz, Struff, Davidovich Fokina, and Djokovic all become part of a broader argument: Wimbledon still rewards players who know how to play grass, not just players with the biggest games. Send us Fan Mail
Serena Williams’ Wimbledon return raised a more interesting question than whether she could still resemble her peak. She was not championship-relevant, but she was match-relevant — and that gap became the center of this episode. Alvin and Torrey break down why Serena’s loss was less about being unable to compete and more about the specific costs of time away from singles: missed second-serve returns, late first-strike execution, slower recovery out of the corners, and a third-set dip once the match became physically expensive. At the same time, her grass instincts, tactical adjustments, and problem-solving remained visible throughout. The episode then widens into Wimbledon’s round-one landscape, including the instability of the women’s draw and Ben Shelton’s five-set loss. Shelton’s match becomes the clearest tactical lesson on the men’s side: an elite serve can create a top-tier profile, but without a more dependable return game, Slam matches remain too fragile. Send us Fan Mail
Serena Williams has received a Wimbledon draw that gives her a credible competitive opportunity. Maya Joint is a manageable opening matchup, Alexandra Eala would present a playable second round, and instability around Iga Świątek could remove the section’s highest-ranked obstacle. Grass also favors Serena’s serve, return and immediate weight of shot more than a slower surface would. But a favorable bracket is not the same as an easy tournament. Serena’s ceiling will depend on whether her movement, recovery and match tolerance survive the accumulated demands of consecutive rounds. The episode also examines why Novak Djokovic remains structurally suited to Wimbledon, how repeated resistance could wear down Jannik Sinner and why Alexander Zverev may be the tournament’s second-strongest title candidate. On the women’s side, the hosts disagree over Aryna Sabalenka’s difficult quarter and identify Belinda Bencic as a disciplined tactical threat to Coco Gauff. Send us Fan Mail
Serena Williams returns to Wimbledon at 44 with obvious physical questions—but also with advantages few comeback players possess. Alvin Owusu and Anastasia examine why her serve, return positioning, first-strike instincts and accumulated grass-court intelligence could still make her dangerous without requiring anything close to her prime form. Her prospects may depend less on ranking than on matchup. A favorable early opponent could allow Serena to shorten points, establish rhythm and let the pressure of the occasion work in her favor. A composed mover who extends exchanges and refuses to play Serena’s reputation, however, could expose the limits of the comeback immediately. The episode also considers whether Wimbledon should pursue an instant blockbuster or allow Serena’s story to develop through the draw, before turning to Aryna Sabalenka’s grass-court credentials and the assumption that completing the career Grand Slam is inevitable. Send us Fan Mail
Aryna Sabalenka remains the standard in women’s tennis, but the tour around her has changed. In this midseason WTA review, Alvin and Torrey examine whether Sabalenka’s consistency is still enough to separate her from the field—or whether the depth of the women’s game has finally caught up. The conversation moves beyond power and ranking points into the structure of elite tennis: Sabalenka’s lack of a true B-game, Iga Świątek’s ongoing tactical evolution, Elena Rybakina’s need to convert peaks into sustained results, and Coco Gauff’s long-term ceiling as her serve and forehand continue to develop. The episode closes with Serena Williams’ return, treated not as nostalgia but as a tennis question: how much of Serena’s ball-striking, movement, and aura still translates against today’s field? Send us Fan Mail
Alexander Zverev’s first Grand Slam title may look like a breakthrough, but the stronger explanation is consistency. He has spent years placing himself in major semifinals and finals, remaining physically prepared deep into tournaments and waiting for the opening that eventually appeared. Alvin and Patrick discuss why Zverev’s defining advantage may be availability—and whether lifting the burden of chasing a first major could allow him to play with greater offensive freedom. The episode also compares Zverev’s career with Daniil Medvedev’s before moving into Alvin’s completion of the Fan Slam. He explains what distinguishes Roland Garros, Wimbledon, the Australian Open and the US Open as live experiences, including why ball weight and trajectory can look entirely different from courtside. The final section looks toward Wimbledon. Novak Djokovic’s challenge is no longer simply producing a championship level; it is controlling the physical cost of seven matches. The hosts also assess Jakub Mensik, João Fonseca and Rafael Jódar as the next ATP group trying to establish a place behind Sinner and Alcaraz. Send us Fan Mail
Alexander Zverev is finally a Grand Slam champion. His five-set win over Flavio Cobolli at Roland Garros removes the largest remaining question from one of the most accomplished résumés in men’s tennis. The episode argues that Zverev’s title is not evidence of a sudden transformation, but the result of a player finally trusting his existing game long enough to finish the job. Alvin and Torrey break down the dual nature of the final: nervous, imperfect, and unmistakably human, but also full of the patterns that have defined Zverev’s career. His forehand aggression, his tendency to become passive under pressure, and his ability to endure physically all shaped the match. The discussion also compares Zverev’s breakthrough to other late-career or long-awaited Slam victories, while noting that champions do not owe apologies for the draws they receive. The conversation then expands to Cobolli’s run and the broader ATP landscape. With emerging players like João Fonseca, Jakub Menšík, and Martín Landaluce Jodar making deeper moves, the hosts ask whether men’s tennis is entering a more crowded, more competitive phase beneath Sinner and Alcaraz. Send us Fan Mail
Mirra Andreeva is a Grand Slam champion, but the more interesting question is what the title actually proves. Alvin and Torrey argue that Andreeva did not suddenly become a different player at Roland Garros. She confirmed the level that had already been visible: heavy shape, backhand stability, controlled aggression, and enough variety to solve a complicated clay-court final. The tactical center of the episode is Maja Chwalinska. Rather than treating her run as a fluke or her game as defensive, the conversation frames Chwalinska as a nuanced offensive player who uses directionals, rhythm changes, drop shots, and “Option C” decision-making to pull opponents into uncomfortable patterns. The episode then expands into a broader discussion of Cinderella runs in women’s tennis, comparing Chwalinska's breakthrough with Emma Raducanu, Leylah Fernandez, Lois Boisson, Coco Gauff, and Bianca Andreescu. The key distinction is between a player’s peak and their baseline: Andreeva’s title fits her long-term profile, while Valinska’s run may be a brilliant two-week peak that still has to be earned again on tour. Send us Fan Mail
Jannik Sinner’s five-set Roland Garros loss to Juan Manuel Cerundolo leads the episode, but the conversation quickly moves beyond the upset itself. Alvin and Torrey examine whether the result was simply a physical failure from Sinner, or whether it reflects a broader shift in the men’s game: deeper fields, longer rallies, and more complete opponents who can no longer be dismissed as early-round obstacles. The most detailed tactical section centers on Ben Shelton’s loss to Raphael Collignon. Shelton’s clay game is improving, but the match exposed issues that matter on slower surfaces: return percentage, predictable forehand direction, and the need to build points from neutral positions rather than relying on first-strike power. The episode closes by looking at the next generation of men’s tennis and the physical cost of the modern game. Players are faster, stronger, and more tactically advanced, but the body may not be evolving at the same pace as the sport. Send us Fan Mail
Taylor Fritz and Jessica Pegula both exited Roland Garros in the first round, but this episode looks beyond the scorelines. Alvin and Torrey use those losses to examine a larger clay-court truth: players who rely on first-strike certainty are more vulnerable when opponents can absorb pace, change height, extend rallies, and force uncomfortable decisions. The central framework is “time gained vs. time lost.” On clay, extra time is not always an advantage; it can become another decision. Players must constantly choose between shape, depth, drive, defense, drop shots, and transition. That makes Roland Garros a test of tactical range as much as form. The episode also covers Daniil Medvedev’s clay-court volatility, hot Paris conditions, string-tension adjustments, the rise of younger men on clay, Frances Tiafoe’s clean professional win, Felix Auger-Aliassime’s five-set resilience, Haley Baptiste’s belief, Naomi Osaka’s opening-round problem-solving, and the broader scheduling pressures affecting Slam fields. Send us Fan Mail
Roland Garros is rarely just a question of who has the highest level. On clay, every return game, long rally, and physical exchange changes the tournament before the second week even begins. In this draw show, Alvin and Torrey frame Paris as an attrition tournament — one where the draw itself becomes a defining opponent. The strongest lens is Coco Gauff’s title defense. Rather than treating Coco as the same player who won the event, the episode looks at whether her game has evolved: a steadier toss, a more assertive forehand, improved serve patterns, elite passing shots, and the ability to blend counterpunching with offense. On the men’s side, Sinner remains the standard, but Zverev emerges as the clearest non-Sinner championship alternative because of how the draw breaks around him. Novak’s section is more demanding, Alcaraz’s absence changes the geometry of the tournament, and the early rounds are filled with players capable of draining the favorites before the business end. Send us Fan Mail
Apple Podcasts rankings supplied by Mato Topic Intelligence Platform.
Observed July 30, 2026.
Apple and Apple Podcasts are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.