The Uncertainty Podcast

Kevin Scharp comes back on the podcast to discuss William Lane Craig’s eight-part case for the existence of God: contingency, cosmology, mathematics, fine-tuning, consciousness, morality, miracles, and experience. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:20 Behind the scenes: Kevin vs. William Lane Craig 00:14:11 Craig on probability & inference to the best explanation 00:23:07 Divine psychology and fine-tuning 00:27:06 Argument #1 - Contingency 00:43:30 Does everything need an explanation? 00:49:48 Argument #2 - Kalam cosmological argument 00:51:35 Actual infinity and Hilbert’s Hotel 01:03:06 Argument #3 - Fine-tuning 01:09:53 What does the Big Bang actually tell us? 01:11:53 Divine psychology 01:27:08 Argument #4 - Applicability of mathematics 01:35:08 Argument #5 - Consciousness 01:40:47 Does consciousness really get us to God? 01:45:41 Argument #6 - Morality 01:54:43 Argument #7 - The resurrection of Jesus 01:58:27 Miracles and the laws of nature 02:08:25 Argument #8 - Experience of God Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Ralph Weir answers all my questions about the mind-body problem, how we define "physical," whether I can conceive of philosophical zombies, and where panpsychism fits into all this. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:35 How Ralph got into philosophy of mind 00:05:52 Eliminativism: do mental states exist? 00:09:00 What is illusionism? 00:10:56 What is phenomenal consciousness? 00:17:53 What are qualia? 00:21:33 What does “physical” actually mean? 00:29:03 Is panpsychism a form of physicalism? 00:35:45 Mapping the mind-body problem 00:45:16 Property dualism vs. substance dualism 00:53:10 What is the strongest case against physicalism? 01:00:32 Philosophical zombies and modal skepticism 01:10:23 Can science settle the mind-body problem? 01:18:20 Mental causation and physical anomalies 01:22:31 Does the evidence favor physicalism? 01:34:07 Which philosophical view is Ralph most uncertain about? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

You do NOT want to miss this debate on the perennial question that human beings have wondered about for thousands of years: does God exist? Josh presents both a cumulative case for theism, as well as his signature argument from arbitrary limits. Mike presents his novel argument against God's infinite attributes. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:48 Joshua Rasmussen’s opening statement 00:17:05 Michael Huemer’s opening statement 00:33:26 Moderated discussion begins 00:35:43 Infinity and the nature of God 00:45:18 What grounds an eternal reality? 00:48:13 God, consciousness, and omniscience 00:54:18 Platonism, infinity, and the digits of π 01:01:18 Can God have unlimited power? 01:07:29 Does theism best explain reality? 01:14:08 Fine-tuning and the multiverse 01:20:27 Does a multiverse actually explain life? 01:26:39 Suffering and the problem of evil 01:32:56 Closing statements Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Emily McRae, professor of philosophy at the University of New Mexico, offers an overview of Buddhist philosophy. In particular, we discuss the different traditions within Buddhism - Theravada, Mahayana, Tibetan, and Zen - the doctrine of emptiness, the Four Noble Truths, and the ontology of Nirvana: annihilation, eternal bliss, or a state of mind in the here and now? Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:55 Moral ignorance in Buddhist philosophy 00:06:47 What drew Emily to Buddhist philosophy? 00:10:36 Analytic philosophy vs. Buddhist philosophy 00:13:41 What kind of ethical theory is Buddhism? 00:21:26 Is Buddhism a religion or a philosophy? 00:24:37 The major schools of Buddhism 00:29:56 Emptiness and the Buddhist theory of the self 00:37:47 Why the Buddha refused to answer some questions 00:43:02 The Four Noble Truths 00:46:01 The first Noble Truth: suffering 00:51:04 The second Noble Truth: the causes of suffering 00:53:43 The third Noble Truth: the end of suffering 00:56:10 What is nirvana? 01:00:14 Does Buddhism ultimately teach annihilation? 01:07:15 Buddhism vs. Christianity on desire 01:12:18 The fourth Noble Truth: the Eightfold Path 01:16:16 What reason is there to believe Buddhism is true? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

In my recent discussion with Ethan Muse , he made a case for the compatibility of God's perfect love and the doctrine of eternal conscious torment. Randal Rauser returns to the channel to respond. Are we far more wicked than we realize? Does any sin merit infinite punishment? What should we do if we struggle with fear of eternal hell? We discuss these questions and much else besides. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:06 Randal’s approach to YouTube 00:03:08 Initial reactions to Ethan Muse’s defense of hell 00:08:34 Is the problem emotional or intellectual? 00:16:07 The authority of the Catholic Church 00:22:16 The three Christian views of hell 00:25:00 Are human beings wicked enough to deserve hell? 00:31:02 Does every sin merit infinite punishment? 00:36:29 Moral culpability and ignorance 00:43:08 Is rejecting God an infinitely serious sin? 00:47:08 Will most people go to hell? 00:53:19 Would creation be a net moral failure? 00:56:30 Did Jesus teach eternal conscious torment? 01:03:29 The central moral argument against eternal hell 01:07:18 Do the noetic effects of sin undermine moral intuition? 01:12:19 Should we trust the moral judgment of Catholic saints? 01:20:48 Does moral disagreement undermine our intuitions? 01:24:07 Different degrees of suffering in hell 01:28:16 How should Christians cope with the fear of hell? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

This week's interview features...me! I have finally gotten around to answering all the questions you sent me when we hit 3,000 subscribers. Yes, this video is v late. Yes, it is v worth the watch. Prepare for a more informal, cheeky side of me. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:20 Which guest has challenged you the most? 00:01:12 Are the fundamental constants independent? 00:02:44 What are your hobbies outside philosophy? 00:03:49 Were you ever an atheist? 00:03:52 Why is there something rather than nothing? 00:05:18 Have you ever considered becoming a model? 00:05:22 How much do you think about modality? 00:05:52 Have you ever had a religious experience? 00:06:13 What are the best arguments for theism? 00:07:27 What are the chances that universalism is true? 00:08:16 Were you always smart? 00:08:19 Paul Draper’s understated evidence objection 00:10:50 Will theism grow among philosophers? 00:11:43 An empirical approach to religion 00:12:42 The aesthetic argument for God 00:13:55 Will philosophy ever abandon materialism? 00:15:08 How have your views on theism evolved? 00:17:45 Is universalism true or theism false? 00:18:44 What is your journal acceptance rate? 00:18:57 What do you think about TAG? 00:19:27 How can someone find their life’s purpose? 00:20:00 Does universalism weaken the problem of evil? 00:21:56 What makes you doubt Christianity? 00:23:50 Has Paul Draper weakened your theism? 00:25:34 Which dead philosophers would you speak to? 00:27:46 Do theistic arguments depend on modality? 00:29:30 Where do you hope to be in ten years? 00:29:38 What if fine-tuning gave no support to theism? 00:29:54 Why does God exist? 00:31:02 Can you publish without a philosophy degree? 00:31:19 What does it mean to exist? 00:32:09 Are theistic arguments more technically vulnerable? 00:34:32 Who are you? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Philosopher Kevin Scharp discusses his experience working with A.I. agents, and what it portends for the future. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:10 What AI agents are 00:03:22 Why AI agents remain under the radar 00:06:07 Creating research-level AI agents 00:08:44 How AI agents work 00:11:06 Are AI agents conscious? 00:17:59 Have AI agents already achieved AGI? 00:21:40 Embodied agents and what comes next 00:24:57 Automation, unemployment, and social unrest 00:27:05 AI as an unprecedented capacity for harm 00:28:46 Could governance and AI rights slow development? 00:32:00 Has ChatGPT become less useful? 00:39:34 AI, human extinction, and theism 00:43:08 Does AI favor naturalism over theism? 00:46:35 How to live under existential uncertainty 00:49:31 Atheism, agnosticism, and changing your mind Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Lance Bush returns to the channel to discuss the need for empirical research in philosophy, whether philosophers even want to find the answers to their questions, and, of course, phenomenal conservatism (which is true, btw). Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:03:12 Common mistakes in student writing 00:06:54 Brevity and writing as a craft 00:09:34 Why Lance pursued psychology over philosophy 00:13:58 Studying moral language empirically 00:20:03 What psychology reveals about philosophical practice 00:24:59 A pragmatic theory of meaning 00:31:22 Does philosophy differ from science? 00:43:37 Why philosophers disagree 00:47:40 Could philosophy ever be solved? 00:56:31 Bias and the David Enoch debate 01:00:31 Competing philosophical starting points 01:05:58 Heterodox views and accusations of contrarianism 01:08:43 Debate mistakes and the possibility of a rematch 01:11:46 Michael Huemer and future conversations 01:13:39 Phenomenal conservatism 01:16:22 Epistemic blank checks 01:20:03 Defeaters and the psychology of seemings 01:24:57 Pragmatism and philosophical goals Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Ethan Muse and I spar over the problem of evil, cosmic fine-tuning, infallible popes, and the doctrine of eternal conscious torment. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:44 Rutgers, philosophy, and Catholic apologetics 00:05:08 Ethan’s path into philosophy 00:09:52 The goal of doing philosophy 00:13:52 Ethan’s conversion to Catholicism 00:17:55 Doubts, confidence, and the problem of evil 00:23:45 Miracle evidence and outweighing evil 00:25:04 Fine-tuning and theism 00:28:48 Frequency data, design, and Bayesianism 00:33:43 Mini-verses and apparent design 00:38:20 What fine-tuning means 00:41:04 Apparent design and fragile harmony 00:46:38 The infrared bullseye analogy 00:51:29 Design, stalking horses, and naturalism 00:59:56 Priors, bare theism, and Bayesian machinery 01:04:53 Papal infallibility and alleged counterexamples 01:11:36 Eternal hell and Catholic doctrine 01:19:46 Moral intuition against eternal torment 01:22:42 Saints, sin, and moral authority 01:30:12 Moral progress and Catholic tradition 01:32:57 Moral disagreement and final thoughts Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Michael Huemer, philosopher at U.C. Boulder, joins me for a wide-ranging discussion of arguments for and against the existence of God, with special focus on his new argument for atheism: the impossibility of an infinite God. Check out Mike’s book, Knowledge, Value, and Reality: A Mostly Common Sense Guide to Philosophy . Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:42 Huemer’s research on consciousness 00:05:42 Could LLMs be conscious? 00:08:11 Physicalism and consciousness 00:14:36 Why physicalism became so popular 00:17:16 Metaphysics and scientific evidence 00:21:01 Could God be empirically detected? 00:23:37 Why Huemer is agnostic 00:25:48 Philip Goff’s limited God 00:27:23 Can a limited God explain evil? 00:36:03 Divine psychology and skeptical theism 00:38:37 Can theism make predictions? 00:46:54 Scientific confirmation and theistic arguments 00:51:59 Which theistic arguments fail? 00:53:14 The ontological argument 00:58:06 The modal ontological argument 01:01:03 Necessary beings and modal intuitions 01:07:23 The Kalam cosmological argument 01:08:54 Could time have a beginning? 01:12:22 Can God create time? 01:18:22 Cosmology and the Big Bang 01:23:48 Actual and potential infinities 01:26:00 Huemer’s new argument for atheism 01:29:28 Divine infinity and omniscience Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Is it even possible to have empirical evidence for God's existence? What if the stars realigned to spell out "I exist! Sincerely, God." Wouldn't THAT count as evidence for God? It seems that the answer is yes. But then, various objections to arguments for God seem to imply that even this extravagant, awesome evidence for God would not be any evidence whatsoever for theism. To many philosophers, that implication implies that these objections prove too much, and must therefore fail. In this debate, eight philosophers go head-to-head over these fascinating questions. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:10 Miles Donahue’s opening statement 00:07:46 Brian Cutter’s opening statement 00:13:16 Noah McKay’s opening statement 00:18:30 Travis Dumsday’s opening statement 00:23:30 Paul Draper’s opening statement 00:29:15 Alex Malpass’s opening statement 00:35:18 Nathan Bray’s opening statement 00:40:41 Kevin Scharp’s opening statement 00:47:15 Miles Donahue’s cross-examination 01:03:22 Alex Malpass’s cross-examination 01:20:15 Brian Cutter’s cross-examination 01:33:41 Nathan Bray’s cross-examination 01:49:03 Paul Draper’s cross-examination 02:01:21 Travis Dumsday’s cross-examination 02:10:54 Kevin Scharp’s cross-examination 02:24:49 Noah McKay’s cross-examination Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Matthew Vines, author of God and the Gay Christian: The Biblical Case in Support of Same-Sex Relationships , joins me to discuss the revised version of this now classic texts. Has Matt has changed his mind on any major issues? What, in the end, would Matt conclude if he determined that the Bible did prohibit same-sex relationships? Listen to find out! Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:05 What changed in God and the Gay Christian 00:03:28 Endnotes, footnotes, and writing for different audiences 00:05:02 How Matthew Vines’s views have changed 00:05:51 Romans 1 and female same-sex relations 00:07:48 Arsenokoitai, Malakoi, and Paul’s meaning 00:10:22 Same-sex marriage in the biblical world 00:13:45 To whom is the book written? 00:15:06 Expressive individualism and affirming theology 00:19:37 How the American church has changed 00:20:23 Affirming churches without guardrails 00:25:45 Conservative backlash and slippery slopes 00:27:55 Being between Christian and queer spaces 00:29:11 Queer theory, polyamory, and sexual orientation 00:30:55 Transgender Christians and biblical interpretation 00:34:48 Gender dysphoria, transition, and Christian ethics 00:39:08 What if the Bible prohibited same-sex marriage? 00:49:44 Moral intuition, inerrancy, and Jesus 01:00:05 Biblical authority, inspiration, and inerrancy 01:08:21 Where evangelical churches may be headed Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

I discuss and debate the merits of drug-induced experiences for one's religious beliefs, the difference panpsychism makes, the distinction between God's essence and energies, and giant purple platypuses floating over New York City. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:32 What is 5-MeO-DMT? 00:02:07 Why Philip Goff tried toad venom 00:05:02 What the experience was like 00:07:13 Can you experience yourself not existing? 00:13:00 Was ego death terrifying? 00:17:03 William Lane Craig’s reaction 00:19:57 What is a structureless claim? 00:22:52 The content of mystical experience 00:25:39 Does 5-MeO-DMT support panpsychism? 00:33:15 Why trust a drug-induced experience? 00:40:08 Experience versus interpretation 00:43:54 Is Goff projecting panpsychism onto the experience? 00:46:03 What would defeat the experience? 00:51:25 How does this fit with Christianity? 00:57:19 Divine essence, energies, and simplicity 01:04:19 Why Christianity specifically? 01:08:26 Why not deism or another religion? 01:14:23 Does Goff believe in an afterlife? 01:16:43 Near-death experiences and consciousness 01:18:37 What is Goff most uncertain of? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Talia Mae Bettcher and Tomas Bogardus join me to debate the question, "What is a woman?". Is gender biologically grounded, socially constructed, or something else entirely? If you're looking for a cordial and substantive exchange from two thinkers who fundamentally disagree on these issues, look no further. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:17 Bogardus opening statement 00:02:03 Dictionaries and ordinary usage 00:03:41 The ambiguity view 00:07:09 The resistant concept of woman 00:08:12 Circularity and self-identification 00:11:23 The relevance objection to ambiguity 00:13:47 Non-human men and women 00:16:17 Bettcher opening statement 00:18:29 Woman as a philosophical question 00:19:44 Folk concepts and biological definitions 00:22:13 Folk concepts vs. theoretical concepts 00:24:45 Adult, human, and female 00:28:14 Open discussion begins 00:28:57 Bettcher on the ambiguity thesis 00:30:28 Family resemblance and trans womanhood 00:35:16 Political concepts and same-sex marriage 00:52:25 Are folk concepts biological? 00:57:47 Souls, bodies, and female identity 01:04:31 Twin Earth, Superman, and non-human men 01:13:13 Stone lions, Batman, and conceptual analysis 01:26:44 The husbandry argument 01:29:44 Sex, function, and biology 01:34:35 Why the question matters 01:39:44 Closing statements Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Keegan Kjeldson of the Untimely Reflections YouTube channel returns to the podcast to discuss the merits of continental philosophy. While he is largely in favor and I am not, we both agree that Hegel is abysmally obscure. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:18 Hegel vs Plantinga: obscurity and clarity 00:03:07 Keegan’s defense of continental philosophy 00:08:38 Why continental philosophy feels impenetrable 00:11:15 Spinoza and intuitive knowledge 00:14:25 Nietzsche, style, and philosophical insight 00:18:07 Logical positivism and ethics 00:22:21 What is metaethics? 00:27:17 Utilitarianism and moral intuitions 00:30:17 Do arguments bottom out in intuition? 00:36:39 What is philosophy for? 00:44:41 Moral realism and objective moral truth 00:48:59 Judith Butler and the charge of gibberish 00:54:10 Clear continental thinkers 00:55:57 Heidegger and justified obscurity 01:02:00 Is clarity always a virtue? 01:06:49 Can poetry give us rational grounds? 01:12:52 Moral knowledge vs moral persuasion 01:15:29 Motivated reasoning in ethics 01:25:21 Ethics, emotion, and objectivity 01:28:14 The Nazi example and moral realism 01:32:26 Abortion, personhood, and moral disagreement 01:38:44 Objective truth in morality and science 01:41:17 Has humanity made moral progress? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

The great, the one, the only Joseph C. Schmid returns to the podcast to offer a comprehensive reply to (almost) every objection to the fine-tuning argument for theism. Ever worried about puddles? Inverse gamblers? Stalking horses? Boltzmann Brains? Alex Malpass? Well, fear no more: we define, describe, and dispel (or defend!) all these concerns and more. Not gonna lie guys, this is one of my favorite discussions so far. Hats off to Joe for being 10/10 great. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:45 #1 The puddle analogy refutes the FTA 00:05:49 #2 Other forms of life are possible! 00:08:58 #3 The multiverse explains fine-tuning 00:53:08 #4 Electrons in love 01:16:06 #5 We couldn't have observed a non-fine-tuned universe 01:21:09 #6 Maybe the constants are metaphysical necessary! 01:33:38 #7 Our universe is hostile to life 01:42:00 #8 Alex Malpass and the stalking horse objection 01:47:54 #9 We cannot get a grip on divine psychology Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Dan Linford returns to the channel to offer his reply to my recent discussion with William Lane Craig, wherein he replied to critiques of his case for a cosmic beginning. We discuss probability theory, the BGV theorem, emergence of spacetime, and the relevance of quantum gravity to our scientific inferences about a beginning of the universe. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:24 Craig's modest claim 00:10:27 How to calculate the probability of a conclusion 00:15:21 The probabilistic fallacy in Craig's scientific case 00:21:56 Craig - "I'm ruling out classes of models" 00:26:33 Exceptions to the BGV theorem 00:29:22 Do theories of time make a difference? 00:42:28 Inference to the best explanation and low probability 00:51:25 Craig's inconsistency: temporally finite models of the universe 00:59:18 Why we need a quantum theory of gravity 01:12:04 The emergence of spacetime Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

David Enoch and Lance Bush face off over the question of whether objective moral truths exist. They debate the intuitiveness of moral realism, whether most people are moral realists, question-begging, radical skepticism, and much else besides. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:38 David's opening statement 00:13:21 Lance's opening statement 00:26:05 "I don't give a damn if most people aren't moral realists" 00:31:59 Who is begging the question on whom? 00:35:55 Is realism the intuitive position? 00:40:35 Is Lance a radical skeptic? 00:43:39 Realists misattribute metaethical claims to most people 00:57:48 "People in general are idiots" 01:02:06 Does ordinary moral discourse support realism? 01:10:42 What are the costs of realism and anti-realism? 01:18:15 On the strengths and weaknesses of analytic philosophy 01:22:33 What do you mean when you say something is “wrong,” Lance? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

Joshua Rasmussen explains his cosmological argument for God's existence: the existence of contingent things requires an explanation, and God fits the bill. Roughly stated, for sure, but that's the idea. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you’re awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:57 Why the question matters 00:10:29 Is ultimate reality beyond logic? 00:14:55 Contingent vs. necessary things 00:20:44 Stage #1 - From contingent things to a necessary being 00:26:38 What is an "explanation"? 00:36:23 Why should there be an explanation of all contingent things? 00:47:37 Should we trust what intuition tells us? 00:55:56 Conflicting empirical generalizations - a la Joe Schmid 01:04:04 Stage #2 - From a necessary being to God 01:12:52 Even a limitless God requires explanation 01:23:37 Graham Oppy's necessary initial state of nature Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe

William Lane Craig, Christian philosopher and apologist, returns to the channel to defend his use of cosmology in support of the kalam cosmological argument. In particular, we focus on recent critiques of his work from Daniel Linford, Phil Halper, Niayesh Afshordi, and others. Video of this interview is available on YouTube . To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee . Follow me on X because you're awesome . EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00 Introduction 00:06 Craig's case for a cosmic beginning 02:55 "We don't have a quantum theory of gravity" 09:24 Has Craig misunderstood probabilities? 15:44 Can you give a parody argument against a beginning? 20:23 Finite past vs. beginning to exist 24:08 The emergence of spacetime 28:05 The Malament-Manchak theorem 35:42 The BGV theorem and its limits 42:08 The generalized second law of thermodynamics 44:26 Sean Carroll's model of an eternal universe 47:58 Why don't all cosmologists agree about a beginning? 50:39 Does your scientific case require your philosophical case? Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe