Podcast charts
Published by Stuart Wemyss & Mena Abraham
Business by Design is the podcast for owners who want to start, scale or exit a business. Each week, Stuart Wemyss and Mena Abraham unpack the four things every business must get right: value, engine, reach and team. Using the VERT flywheel, they show how these fit together to build a business that runs without you, and how the choices you make inside the business flow through to your personal wealth, lifestyle and exit options. Every episode is short and to the point, with no fluff and no sales pitches. Go to https://www.businessbydesignpodcast.com
On the charts
Every published chart this podcast appears in, in the snapshot behind this page. Each one links to the chart it came off.
From the feed
The latest episodes published to this podcast’s own RSS feed. Titles and descriptions are the publisher’s.
Send us Fan Mail Two businesses can charge the same price today and be on opposite margin trajectories five years from now, purely because of the architecture sitting underneath that number. One gets more profitable as it grows; the other gets squeezed with every new customer. This episode is about designing that architecture on purpose. Mena starts with discounting as a diagnostic: persistent discounting isn't a sales problem but a signal pointing at one of three causes, and J.C. Penney's disastrous 2012 "fair and square" experiment shows why you can't simply switch off years of trained customer behaviour. Stuart then unpacks the traps of unit pricing, the default model most owners fall into without choosing it, from the billable hour that punishes efficiency to the petrol-station race no one wins on quality. Mena lays out the real choice between fixed, tiered and modular pricing (with Australia Post, Canva and IKEA as clean examples), and Stuart explains why scope is the boundary that makes any of them work. Finally, Mena drives home the cost base as a non-negotiable floor, using Porter Davis Homes' collapse under fixed-price contracts as the cautionary tale. Closes with four steps to build your own pricing system. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Price is the most powerful profit lever most business owners never think about. In this episode, Mena and I break down the pricing strategy question that matters most: are you a price maker or a price taker? A modest price rise can lift profit far more than an equivalent cost cut or volume increase, since it drops straight to the bottom line and improves your margin without touching your cost base The value map: plot your competitors on price against perceived value to see whether your market is commoditised or genuinely open to premium pricing, and where the white space sits If you're a price taker, there are only two real levers, deliver more value than the market expects, or build a leaner engine so you can deliver at a lower cost Price is a signal customers read before they've experienced anything. Price too low and the market assumes the quality is low too, price too high without anything to back it up and you're exposed Chapters 00:16 - Why pricing is the most powerful lever on profit 02:29 - Building the value map: price makers versus price takers 06:21 - What to do if you land in the price taker camp 10:15 - Price as a signal: what buyers read into it before they buy 12:43 - When value based pricing tips into unfair pricing 17:55 - This week's homework: map your own position Reference links Last week's episode on building a brand promise is referenced directly at the open, and next week's episode on pricing models is flagged at the close. Neither title nor link is confirmed in the transcript itself, so whoever publishes this should drop in the actual links rather than me guessing at either title. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Most owners sell backwards. You built the thing, so you know every feature and inclusion, and that's exactly what comes out of your mouth when you sell it, while the customer's eyes glaze over. They were never buying a spec sheet; they were buying a different version of their life. Sell the feature, and you compete on the feature; someone will always build it cheaper. Sell the outcome, and prove it, and price becomes the last objection, not the first. Mena breaks down the three layers every customer buys at once: functional, emotional, and social value using Canva as the case study, and why a strong offer hits all three by design. Stuart shows how to compress that into a Core Promise: one sentence, in the customer's own words, that they could repeat without you (think Domino's, Bunnings, FedEx) plus why the proof underneath the promise is where businesses fall. Then the part owners skip: quantifying the cost of inaction, with Blockbuster's ten-year compounding mistake as the warning. Finally, the three forms of proof mechanism- social proof, guarantee, and a FedEx masterclass that ties it all together. Closes with a four-part self-audit. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Before you can test whether people will pay, you need to know whose "yes" you're actually chasing, and most owners get this wrong in a very specific way. In this Value deep dive, Stuart and Mena introduce reverse-engineering the yes: start from the moment someone buys, then work backwards to the buyer, the outcome, and the trigger that got them there. Mena explains why "business owners" or "SMEs" isn't a target customer at all, just a category, using Peloton, Chewy, and Lululemon to show how precision changes everything from price to product. The test: if your customer description could be swapped into a competitor's marketing and still make sense, it's too broad. Stuart reframes the real buyer around the progress they're trying to make: the barrister who sells career risk-reduction, the Amex Platinum buyer who's buying status, not what your product does. Then the three-part filter for a genuine customer: a live trigger (Ring's fear event versus Cleardocs' life-stage moment), constraints you design around (Planet Fitness deleting the contract), and the capacity, not just desire to pay (Tesla redesigning its buyer as price fell). Plus why being deliberate about who you're not for, à la Hermès and Costco, is a competitive advantage. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Founders love to scale, but scaling before anyone has paid a real price for a real outcome simply converts a slow failure into a fast, expensive one. In this episode, the first in a deep dive on Value, Stuart names the trap: scaling doesn't fix a weak offer; it just gives that weak offer more customers, more overhead, and more cash to burn. Mena draws the crucial line between attention and demand. Compliments, engagement, and "I'd definitely buy that" are evidence of interest, not a sale. The only test that matters is whether someone has actually paid, in cash, at or near your target price, and heavy discounting is itself a signal the offer isn't yet standing on its own. Stuart offers a sharp three-way diagnostic for when an offer isn't landing: is the problem the segment, the offer, or the message?, illustrated with Segway, Quibi, and early Dropbox. Mena explains how to read the data rather than your feelings, and Stuart lays out fast, cheap tests you can run this month, from pre-selling to price testing. The gate before you scale: paid customers, at the price the business actually needs. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Here's the challenge Stuart opens with: describe your business in four honest sentences, one each for why customers pay, how you deliver profitably, how the right people find you, and how quality holds as you grow. Most owners can talk about their business for an hour but can't compress it into four sentences that survive scrutiny, and that vagueness is itself the problem. This isn't an elevator pitch; it's a decision filter that reveals where you're genuinely strong and where you're quietly weak. Mena walks through the four questions in plain language, warning that "we work hard" is not an engine answer, while Stuart uses Apple as a worked example of what clarity actually looks like. The gap between your four sentences and Apple's is precisely the work to be done. Crucially, the discipline is sequencing, not simultaneous effort: score each sentence, find the weakest, and make it your ninety-day project while the others sit in maintenance. Stuart names the expensive mistake of scaling reach before value and engine are solid, which just spreads weakness faster, and Mena shows how the sentences become a tool for saying no. The goal isn't four polished sentences. It's a business that compounds by design. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail The three "killers" thin margins, poor reach, and weak demand- tell you what's failing, but not what to build. In this episode, Stuart and Mena introduce VERT: Value, Engine, Reach, and Team the operating system underneath those symptoms, and the four things you actually control. By the end, you'll have a single model to run every business decision through, instead of juggling forty disconnected problems. Mena maps the four pillars onto the three killers: margins sit at the intersection of Value (what you can charge) and Engine (what it costs to deliver); Reach gets you chosen but can't manufacture demand; and Team touches everything, holding the whole system together. Stuart then explains why VERT is a flywheel, not a checklist, each pillar reinforcing the next, so momentum comes from consistent pressure on the right point rather than one dramatic push across everything. Mena shares the green flags and red flags for spotting your weakest pillar, and the misdiagnosis trap, where the symptom and cause live in different pillars. Stuart closes with the four-bucket test: a two-question filter for every decision, and a rule to focus your weakest pillar for ninety days while the rest run in maintenance mode. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail A thin margin and an empty pipeline both feel like effort problems, so owners respond with more hours. It rarely works. In this episode, Stuart and Mena reframe both as outputs of how a business is designed its pricing, positioning, and channels- not how hard anyone is trying. Working harder on a broken design just scales the problem and burns the founder out. Mena starts with margin, and the distinction most owners never consciously made: are you a price maker or a price taker? In a price-taker industry like mortgage broking, the market sets the ceiling and effort can't move it. She lays out the three layers that shape margin: industry, business model, execution—so you can locate your own constraint. Stuart then reframes reach as an asset you engineer, not marketing you bolt on, introducing the "trust path": why low-risk, frequent purchases convert fast while high-risk, infrequent ones need a long runway of proof. Mena names the two ways reach breaks: expensive reach that drains cash, and fragile reach where one channel carries too much, plus a simple stress test to expose it. The takeaway: redesign the system rather than push through it. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Before you fix your product, your marketing, or your team, Stuart and Mena argue you have to pressure-test something more fundamental: demand. Get it wrong, and everything else simply compounds a weak foundation. The uncomfortable question most owners skip is deceptively simple: what problem are you solving, for whom, stated specifically rather than in flattering generalities? Plenty of clever products are just solutions looking for a problem. The single best test is asking what it costs your customer to do nothing. When the cost of inaction is high, financially, emotionally, socially, motivation is real. Mena turns that instinct into a practical filter: urgency, frequency, and affordability, including whether a customer can actually fund the purchase at the moment the need hits. Stuart then draws the crucial line between demand you capture and demand you must manufacture, why educating a market that doesn't know it has a problem is brutal, and the rare exception where a big player does the heavy lifting for you. Mena asks whether your market is quietly growing or dying, and how to read the early indicators. The verdict? Compliments tell you nothing. Only a paid invoice tells the truth. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail When a business underperforms, owners tend to assume the cause is complex and set about fixing everything at once. It feels productive, and it almost always fails. Stuart and Mena open with a contrarian claim: struggling businesses are far simpler to diagnose than their owners think. The trouble usually traces to a weakness in just one of three fundamentals. They lay out the three "killers" plainly. First, the revenue you don't keep: thin margins can make a business look healthy while leaving no buffer for mistakes, volatility, or investment. Second, a great business nobody finds, where genuine quality is worth little if the right customers never see it, and referrals get mistaken for a strategy. Third, the cost of demand you have to manufacture: the difference between capturing urgent, existing demand and slowly, expensively educating a market that doesn't yet feel the pain. Running through all three is one sharp distinction, whether a weakness is structural (the industry makes it hard) or self-inflicted (your model or execution), because the fix is completely different in each case. They finish with a two-minute self-score and a rule: work your weakest link for ninety days, and let the rest wait. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail After five years, Stuart and Mena are deliberately retiring a brand that was working, and the reasoning matters more than the rename. Through an accounting lens, they argue, you can tell what already happened to profit and cash, but never why a business produces those numbers or whether they'll repeat. A clean tax structure sitting on top of a fragile business is still a fragile business. Optimising the tax bill was only ever treating the symptom. In this episode, they introduce VERT—Value, Engine, Reach and Team, the four reinforcing parts that actually drive business performance, and the test the whole year keeps circling back to: profit, multiplied by growth, made repeatable. It's a shift from looking backward at the scoreboard to understanding the machine generating the score. They're also refreshingly clear about who the show is now for: owners of Australian businesses turning over roughly $1m to $100m who want to scale, lift profit, or keep their exit options genuinely open. And they spell out the promise that sets it apart: the decisions you make inside your business shape your wealth, your retirement and your lifestyle, not merely this financial year's tax outcome. A new direction, and a sharper reason to listen. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail The holiday test is deceptively simple. If you took four weeks off with no phone, would your business hold its standard, or would it quietly degrade without you? For most business owners, the honest answer points not to a workload problem but to a design problem, and this episode tackles it directly. Stuart opens by reframing the issue: a business that depends on the founder for most decisions is not really a business. It is a job that pays the owner to turn up. That dependency creates a single point of failure, limits growth, and reduces the business's value to any future buyer or successor, since the value is tied to the founder. Mena challenges the most common objection that professional or technical work is too bespoke to systemise, and explains why the real barrier is usually that expert judgement has become automatic and invisible, not that it is genuinely impossible to document. The episode then moves through a practical framework: how to prioritise the critical few processes rather than documenting everything at once, how to turn implicit judgement into decision trees and case libraries, why modern documentation lives in workflows rather than manuals, and how to give every process a named owner with real authority to maintain it. Stuart closes with the metric that matters: count how many decisions escalate to you each month, and treat driving that number down as the real measure of progress. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Asking for customer feedback and then ignoring it is not a neutral act; it tells the customer more about the business than any service failure could on its own. This episode opens with a real example of a high-profile restaurant that solicited specific criticism, replied with a templated response, and confirmed the original concern in the process. It is a pattern more common than most business owners realise, and the commercial cost is significant. Stuart and Mena work through why business owners are structurally poor at seeing their own weaknesses, why silence from customers is not evidence of satisfaction, and why not all feedback deserves equal weight. The discussion challenges the widespread use of Net Promoter Score, arguing that behaviour-based questions, whether a customer has actually referred the business, not whether they intend to, produce more honest and more actionable information. The episode then moves to system design: how short the survey should be, when to ask, who owns the responses, and what a genuine reply looks like versus a template that bears no relationship to what the customer actually said. The B2B context receives specific attention, where feedback conversations work better as structured check-ins than post-project forms. The closing decision rule is direct: a feedback system is only worth building if the business is genuinely prepared to act on what it hears. Anything less is a liability, not an asset. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Most business owners have at least one hiring regret, and most can trace it back to a decision that felt right at the time. The problem is rarely a lack of effort in the interview. It is a lack of structure before and during it. Gut feel tends to reward confidence, charm, and the ability to perform well in a conversation, none of which reliably predict how someone will actually perform in the role. This episode introduces a structured, scorecard-based hiring process designed to replace impression-driven decisions with evidence. Stuart and Mena begin with the pre-work most businesses skip entirely: defining not just what the role involves, but what success looks like across three to five core accountabilities, each with measurable outcomes. From there, the discussion moves to how to assess strengths, experience, and attitude separately, and why attitude, despite being the hardest to evaluate, is often the most important of the three. The scorecard itself becomes the thread running through the entire process, generating interview questions, enabling independent scoring across interviewers, surfacing meaningful disagreements, and ultimately transitioning into a performance management tool after hire. The episode also covers why reference checks are evidence, not administration, how transparency at the offer stage shortens the onboarding gap, and why the cost of one poor senior hire can set a business back by twelve to twenty-four months. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail The proposed 2026 budget tax changes have generated significant concern among business owners, but most of the commentary has focused on politics rather than practical strategy. This episode cuts through the noise and addresses what small business owners should actually be thinking about before any of these changes become law. Stuart and Mena work through three areas where the proposed changes have the greatest potential impact. On trust taxation, the discussion explores how limiting income splitting to family members on lower tax rates shifts the planning focus from who receives income to when and why an interposed company structure may offer meaningful flexibility under the new rules. On capital gains tax, the episode makes the case that the biggest risk for most business owners is not future CGT changes but failing to access the generous small business CGT concessions that already exist today, many of which require years of preparation to qualify for. And on negative gearing, the discussion examines what the removal of deductions means for the economics of established residential property, and why markets often create the best buying opportunities when sentiment is at its weakest. The broader message runs through every segment: tax rules change, governments change, and business owners who build valuable businesses with clean structures and genuine flexibility consistently come out ahead, regardless of which policy environment they find themselves in. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail EOFY Planning for Business Owners: What to Do Before 30 June With the end of the financial year fast approaching, business owners still have time to make decisions that can legitimately reduce tax, improve cash flow, and strengthen their financial position before 30 June. In this episode, Stuart and Mena cut through the noise surrounding EOFY planning and focus on the practical strategies that matter most. They discuss the key areas every business owner should be reviewing in the final weeks of the financial year, including the timing of deductions, managing year-end cash flow, maximising superannuation contributions before the relevant cut-offs, and understanding how the instant asset write-off rules may apply. The conversation also explores the importance of structure, substantiation, and documentation. Many EOFY strategies fail not because the idea was wrong, but because the paperwork, timing, or commercial rationale was not properly considered. Stuart and Mena explain the common mistakes business owners make when rushing to implement last-minute tax strategies and why acting under pressure often creates more problems than it solves. Most importantly, this episode reinforces that effective EOFY planning is not about chasing loopholes or making purchases simply because they are deductible. It is about ensuring the decisions you have already made are properly documented, the opportunities available to you are not overlooked, and any action taken before year-end makes commercial sense as well as tax sense. Whether you are running a small business, managing a growing company, or navigating your first EOFY as a business owner, this episode provides a practical framework to help you approach 30 June with greater clarity and confidence. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Owning your business premises feels like progress, security, control, and the satisfaction of paying rent to yourself rather than a landlord. But for many founders, it is a decision that quietly traps capital, reduces flexibility, and concentrates risk in ways that only become apparent years later. This episode introduces the OpCo-PropCo framework as a structured way to think through one of the most consequential capital decisions a business owner can make. Stuart and Mena explain why the trading business and the property holding entity have fundamentally different risk profiles, return expectations, and time horizons, and why mixing them clouds decision-making and performance visibility for both. The discussion covers how to model the rent-versus-buy decision properly, including opportunity cost, yield comparisons, and realistic assumptions about growth and space requirements. It also addresses the compliance obligations and structural pitfalls of related-party arrangements, the genuine constraints of using an SMSF to hold business premises, and the concentration risk that arises when both business value and personal wealth are tied to a single location. The episode closes with a four-question OpCo-PropCo decision rule designed to bring commercial clarity to what is often an emotionally driven choice. Because owning the building should make the business stronger, not harder to run, harder to fund, and harder to sell. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail A second location, a new service line, a broader geographic footprint, expansion feels like the logical next step for a business that has found its footing. But for many founders, it is precisely where profitability begins to quietly unwind. This episode confronts the expansion illusion directly: the belief that more locations automatically mean more profit. Stuart and Mena explain how revenue growth can mask margin compression, duplicated overhead, and the cultural and operational drift that sets in once founder oversight is stretched across multiple sites. The emotional drivers, ego, validation, boredom with the core, are named honestly. The discussion covers how to model true break-even, including fully loaded costs, management time, training, and the inefficiency of ramp-up; how to set realistic timeline expectations across setup, launch, early traction, and stabilisation; and how to fund expansion without pulling capital and attention away from the proven engine. Structure decisions, branch versus subsidiary, liability containment, and intercompany pricing are framed as strategic choices, not administrative afterthoughts. The episode closes with a clear expansion decision rule built around four questions every founder should answer before committing capital. Because fragmented, inconsistently run sites do not increase enterprise value, they reduce buyer confidence and complicate the eventual exit. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Project-based businesses face a fundamental structural problem: every quarter begins at zero. Revenue can look strong on the surface while cash flow remains volatile, pipeline uncertainty delays hiring decisions, and the founder stays personally essential to winning and scoping every engagement. Effort scales linearly. Value does not. This episode challenges the treadmill dynamic head-on, starting with a clear diagnosis of why project businesses stall at scale, utilisation ceilings, margin leakage, scope creep, and inconsistent client experience. Stuart and Mena then reframe the recurring revenue conversation, pushing back on the idea that recurring means subscriptions only. Retainers, service contracts, bundled support, staged programs, and usage-based models all qualify; what matters is predictability and ongoing value, not billing mechanics. The discussion covers how to productise what a business already does well, design offers clients stay for rather than exit from, get revenue recognition and tax timing right, and control churn before trying to scale acquisition. ARR is positioned not as a metric to report but as a tool to improve forecasting, hiring confidence, and investment timing, and ultimately as a proxy for business quality in the eyes of future buyers. The closing decision rule is simple: Does this offer create ongoing value, or does it just extend delivery? If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Send us Fan Mail Surplus cash flow is not the same as freedom; it is a decision point. And what a founder does with it reveals whether they are building income, lifestyle, or enterprise value. This episode frames lifestyle creep not as a personal failing but as a capital allocation problem with real commercial consequences. Stuart and Mena explore why founders blur the line between personal reward and business extraction once cash pressure eases, and why emotional spending decisions made inside the business create both tax risk and strategic cost. The episode covers the Div 7A traps that follow poor separation, substantiation problems, and private use adjustments that turn "probably fine" into "hard to defend." Beyond compliance, the discussion focuses on opportunity cost, what a $100,000 lifestyle upgrade actually costs when measured against the capability it could have funded instead. A key hire, a management layer, better systems, or advisory support can compound business value in ways a new car never will. The episode closes with a practical capital allocation hierarchy and a four-question decision filter designed to bring discipline to every surplus dollar. Because the founders who build real wealth are not necessarily those who earn the most, they are the ones who allocate most deliberately. If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps us reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of the journey! Click here to subscribe to our weekly email. Work with Mena & Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website . Follow us : Stuart: Twitter/X and LinkedIn . Mena: LinkedIn IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.
Ranking source
Apple Podcasts rankings via the Mato Topic Intelligence Platform.
Observed September 20, 2026.
Apple and Apple Podcasts are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.
Pairs with
Bring this source into Mato to read its transferable patterns, then turn them into an original show for your own audience.