Mato just raised pre-seed Read more
Podcast charts
Published by Don't Matter Media
An eight episode black comedy fiction podcast about a mild-mannered accountant on a quest for vengeance. Written and created by Peter Hoffman Kimball, starring Josh Callahan, and featuring such voice talent as Ptolemy Slocum from HBO's Westworld and Emmy winner Neil Garguilo from MTV's Awkward.
On the charts
Every published chart this podcast appears in, in the snapshot behind this page. Each one links to the chart it came off.
The Mato Topic Intelligence Platform does not report this podcast as charting in a published category in this snapshot.
From the feed
The latest episodes published to this podcast’s own RSS feed. Titles and descriptions are the publisher’s.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew kick off a new review format covering current theatrical releases, starting with Paul Greengrass’s medieval historical drama The Uprising. The hosts dig into the film's depiction of the 1381 English Peasants' Revolt against King Richard II, exploring Greengrass’s visceral direction, dynamic battlefield choreography, and Andrew Garfield’s turn as an unnamed rebel leader. In their spoiler-free review, they discuss the film’s lack of worldbuilding and character backstory, and evaluate who this muddy, action-heavy historical drama is really for. Crossing into the spoiler zone, they discuss how the film actually worked, once you've seen the ending. Topics covered: The narrative risks of skipping the setup and launching straight into a rebellion, why kinetic action directing can't always compensate for thin screenwriting, modern political subtext in historical epics, and why some films leave you admiring the craft while completely forgetting the characters.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack Martin Scorsese's 1990 classic Goodfellas , exploring how its highly stylized editing and unique dual-narrator perspective redefined the gangster genre. They discuss the film’s themes of the illusion of mafia loyalty, the allure of the criminal lifestyle, and the reality of middle management incompetence, and debate whether its intense, stylized violence serves to intentionally desensitize the viewer. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a ruthless challenge: How do you adapt an ultra-violent mob story for families? Could it work as a summer camp movie about a kid slinging contraband candy? What would a no-budget version set entirely inside Paulie's house or a single chaotic car ride look like? Would it be better as an ongoing TV series expanding on the unseen Lufthansa heist? The hosts also celebrate their 40th episode by handing out awards for the past ten movies they've covered, while referencing The Godfather , The Sopranos , Donnie Brasco , The Office , Wet Hot American Summer , A Woman Under the Influence , Children of Men , Mulholland Drive , The Truman Show , Night of the Living Dead , Ran , Scott Pilgrim vs. the World , Cinema Paradiso , and Donnie Darko in their discussion. Topics covered: The cinematic discipline of skipping a highly-anticipated heist scene, the unglamorous reality of cleaning up crime scenes in your own driveway, comparing ruthless mobsters to incompetent regional managers, and why some movies are better experienced as a fast-paced rollercoaster ride.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack John Cassavetes's 1974 independent character study A Woman Under the Influence , exploring how its uncomfortably intimate filmmaking style and incredibly nuanced performances left a lasting mark on independent cinema. They discuss the film’s themes of mental illness versus idiosyncrasy, the dark underbelly of 1970s domestic life, and the messy reality of marriage, and debate whether its challenging, unresolved narrative still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle an uncomfortable challenge: How do you adapt a harrowing domestic drama for families? Could it work as a Mary Poppins -style fantasy where a mother's erratic behavior translates into magical adventures for her kids? What would a no-budget "birthday party from hell" version told entirely from the perspective of an awkward visiting parent look like? Would it be better as a time-hopping TV series exploring the couple's early romance and the future lives of their children in the vein of This Is Us ? The hosts also launch a new segment pitching auteur directors for bizarre brand movies (featuring Edgar Wright and John Milius takes on Crocs), and share their current viewing habits, including Shoresy and The Karate Kid (1984), while referencing Barbie , Battleship , Jumanji , Mean Girls , Red Dawn , Letterkenny , Cobra Kai , Black Swan , The Killing of a Chinese Bookie , Krisha , Blue Valentine , Saturday Night Live , Barry , and Entourage in their discussion. Topics covered: The difference between a low-budget Hollywood film and true independent cinema, the dark cultural undertones of the 1970s, the ethics of the Cobra Kai dojo, the value of long, uncomfortable scenes, and why some masterpieces are deeply rewarding but incredibly unpleasant to watch.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack George Romero's 1968 independent horror classic Night of the Living Dead , exploring how its single-location tension and foundational zombie tropes created an entire cinematic genre. They discuss the film’s themes of interpersonal power dynamics, the futility of survival, and the dark irony of the rescue posse, and debate whether its straightforward, relentless narrative still holds up in a modern world saturated with undead copycats. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a terrifying challenge: How do you adapt a story about flesh-eating ghouls for families? Could it work as a comedic movie about teenagers barricading their house to study for an AP test? What would a high-budget ancient Roman version set during the conquest of Gaul look like? Would it be better as an anthology TV series where the main cast dies every episode, or an X-Files-style detective show investigating petty grudges settled during the outbreak? The hosts also kick off a new segment pitching auteur directors for Disney live-action remakes (featuring Robert Eggers and Christopher McQuarrie takes on Moana), and share their current viewing habits, including Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey and The Invite , while referencing Mission: Impossible, The Witch, Nosferatu, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Carnage, Closer, Die Hard, Jaws, Shaun of the Dead, The Purge, and 28 Days Later in their discussion. Topics covered: The logistical and financial realities of 1960s micro-budget filmmaking, the effectiveness of stripping away character backstories to heighten situational tension, the mechanics of a satisfying twist ending, and why the original blueprint of a genre is always worth revisiting.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack Alfonso Cuarón's 2006 dystopian masterpiece Children of Men , exploring how its gritty, ground-level visual style and masterful "show, don't tell" world-building elevate it beyond a standard action thriller. They discuss the film’s themes of societal collapse, the moral complexities of revolution, and the balance between random chance and miraculous faith, and debate whether its deeply cynical yet hopeful view of humanity still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle an apocalyptic challenge: How do you adapt a bleak story about the end of human reproduction for families? Could it work as a fun adventure where a motley crew of animals helps the last pregnant sea turtle reach a sanctuary, or a quest to save the last growing plant? What would a no-budget version set entirely inside an abandoned Michigan strip mall look like? Would it be better as a gritty 10-episode sci-fi retelling of the biblical Nativity story? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including The Invite , while referencing The Godfather trilogy, Star Wars: A New Hope, The Lord of the Rings, 22 Jump Street, Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2, Pusher, Der Vorname, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Carnage, Closer, The Bourne Identity, and Seinfeld in their discussion. Topics covered: The rarity of truly great movie sequels, the effectiveness of a reluctant "common man" hero over an action superstar, the intricate background details of a collapsing society, and why some cinematic masterpieces are easily misjudged on a first watch because of their superficial accessibility.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack Richard Kelly's 2001 genre-bending cult classic Donnie Darko , exploring how its bizarre time-traveling rabbit and its ambiguous blend of sci-fi, horror, and dark comedy left a lasting mark on early 2000s cinema. They discuss the film’s themes of the isolating teenage experience, the blurred lines of mental illness, and the impact of personal sacrifice, and debate whether its cynical view of corrupt adults still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle an apocalyptic challenge: How do you adapt a dark story about an imaginary doomsday rabbit for families? Could it work as a positive adventure where a happy bunny helps a teen fix his neighbors' hidden problems? What would a no-budget, computer screen-only "Screen Life" version look like? Would it be better as an ongoing TV series expanding the 28-day timeline to explore the bizarre lives of the town's side characters? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including HyperNormalisation and Jackass Best and Last , while referencing Zelig , What's Up, Tiger Lily? , Forrest Gump , It's a Wonderful Life , Mulholland Drive , Fight Club , 2001: A Space Odyssey , Ferris Bueller's Day Off , The Shining , and Missing in their discussion. Topics covered: The creative use of archival footage in documentaries, the Buster Keaton-level visual comedy of Jackass stunts, the sinister camera framing used to introduce Donnie, and why some movies are destined to be subjective personal favorites rather than objectively the greatest films of all time.
Send us Fan Mail The Truman Show Peter and Andrew unpack Peter Weir's 1998 high-concept classic The Truman Show , exploring how its predictive look at reality television and its deeply philosophical allegory left a lasting mark on modern culture. They discuss the film’s themes of what constitutes reality, the ethics of entertainment, and the desire for genuine human relationships, and debate whether its premise of a 24/7 unedited observation still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle an existential challenge: How do you adapt a story about a completely fabricated life for families? Could it work as a summer camp movie where the friendships are staged? What would a no-budget single-room birthday revelation version look like? Would it be better as a TV series about the backstage drama of the actors and crew producing the show? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Voicemails for Isabelle and All Her Fault , while referencing The Matrix, The Real World, Edtv, The Hunger Games, The Running Man, Total Recall, Good Bye Lenin!, The Manchurian Candidate, and The Adjustment Bureau in their discussion. Topics covered: The future of micro-payments and independent media, the logistical nightmare of a 30-year acting gig, the responsibility directors owe to their subjects, how the film introduced new vocabulary for existential delusions, and why some movies are essential to watch for their cultural significance even if you don't return to them often.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew journey through Tornatore's 1988 Italian classic Cinema Paradiso , exploring how its deep love for the theater experience and its sentimental coming-of-age story left a lasting mark on film lovers everywhere. They discuss the film’s themes of the magic of movies, the limitations of growing up in a small town, and the censorship of human expression, and debate whether its straightforward, sentimental narrative still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a nostalgic challenge: How do you adapt a story about a kid growing up loving film for families? Could it work as a Pixar-style animated movie where films on the wall come to life, or an un-family-friendly bloodbath over censorship? What would a no-budget projection booth version focused on Alfredo look like? Would it be better as a period TV series exploring the eccentric characters of postwar Sicily, or a mystery series about the adult Toto returning to face his past? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Four Weddings and a Funeral and Disclosure Day , while referencing Notting Hill , Nine Months , The Running Man , War of the Worlds , Alien , Arrival , Good Will Hunting , Inglourious Basterds , Luca , and Coco in their discussion. Topics covered: The physical danger of early film reels, the universal desire to escape your hometown, the Hollywood reliance on clear villains, the subjective nature of rom-com chemistry, and why some movies are an easy recommendation even if they aren't considered the greatest of all time.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew journey through David Lynch's 2001 surreal psychological thriller Mulholland Drive, exploring how its dream logic and masterful subversion of cinematic language left a lasting mark on modern cinema. They discuss the film’s themes of identity, the dark side of the Hollywood system, and the blurred lines between reality and fantasy, and debate whether its highly open-ended, subjective narrative still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a surreal challenge: How do you adapt a dark story about Hollywood dreams and nightmares for families? Could it work as a straightforward mystery where helping an imaginary friend builds self-confidence? What would a no-budget, single-location version set entirely in a dingy office building look like? Would it be better as a world-expanding TV series exploring the bizarre backstories of side characters like the Cowboy and the hitman? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including the new season of Scrubs and the indie horror hit Obsession, while referencing The Usual Suspects, Swingers, Sunset Boulevard, La La Land, Nashville, Inception, Beau Is Afraid, I'm Thinking of Ending Things, He Loves Me... He Loves Me Not, Eraserhead, The Straight Story, All About Eve, Tully, Twin Peaks, and Good Will Hunting in their discussion. Topics covered: Taking the leap to shoot your first short film, how David Lynch manipulates audience expectations with pacing and camera movement, writing scenes to showcase an actor's range, and why some movies are meant to be rewarding homework rather than casual viewing.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack Edgar Wright's 2010 hyper-kinetic cult classic Scott Pilgrim vs. the World , exploring how its video game-inspired aesthetic and perfectly synced visual comedy left a lasting mark on modern cinema. They discuss the film’s themes of adolescent narcissism, romantic baggage, and fighting for affection, and debate whether its highly stylized "you against the world" message still resonates with audiences today. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a combo-breaking challenge: How do you adapt a stylized story about fighting evil exes for families? Could it work as an Inside Out -style story where Scott literally fights Ramona's fears and doubts? What would a no-budget, quiet room version focused on offering closure to the exes look like? Would it be better as a world-expanding TV series exploring the lives of all the side characters and their own relationship baggage? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Perfect Blue and Inside Man (and their disappointment with Havoc ), while referencing Black Swan , Den of Thieves , Blade Runner , Call Me By Your Name , and Napoleon Dynamite in their discussion. Topics covered: The value of shooting 60-second micro-short films, capturing the emotional intensity of youth, comparing Edgar Wright's visual storytelling to traditional invisible editing, and why some comedies become generational touchstones while others fade away.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew journey through Akira Kurosawa’s 1985 historical epic Ran, exploring how its breathtaking use of bold primary colors and massive practical battle sequences created an unparalleled visual spectacle. They discuss the film’s masterful adaptation of Shakespeare’s King Lear, its complex family dynamics, and debate whether its bleak, karmic message about building an empire on violence makes it a flawless masterpiece or a challenging watch. In their remake scenarios, they tackle an epic challenge: How do you adapt a bloody tragedy about succession for families? Could it work as a Redwall-style animated animal adventure or a Viking coming-of-age story? What would a no-budget version focused solely on Lady Kaede's backroom political manipulations look like? Would it be better as a Game of Thrones-style TV epic or a prequel series exploring the warlord's initial rise to power? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Rooster and The Audacity, while referencing The Office, Shrinking, Ted Lasso, Succession, Game Night, 10 Things I Hate About You, Lord of the Rings, The Departed, Seven Samurai, Gladiator, Braveheart, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Ladyhawke, The Secret of NIMH, Watership Down, How to Train Your Dragon, Shogun, Game of Thrones, Yellowstone, The Crown, and High School Musical in their discussion. Topics covered: How watching films improves your own screenwriting, the value of mimicking writers like Aaron Sorkin to find your voice, the brilliant use of color to aid storytelling, the timeless impact of practical effects, and why some films are worth watching purely for their visual pageantry.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack Gil Junger's 1999 teen romantic comedy 10 Things I Hate About You, exploring how its smart adaptation of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew and its fast-paced, trope-filled character dynamics made it a defining film of the era. They discuss the film’s themes of teenage rebellion, dating expectations, and high school social hierarchies, and debate whether its stylized view of late-90s youth still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a structural challenge: How do you adapt a story about high school dating for families? Could it work as a much darker, R-rated thriller? What would a no-budget, one-location Breakfast Club-style version look like? Would it be better as an ongoing TV series about the fallout of Cameron's disastrous first date, or a sketch-comedy anthology of modern Shakespeare adaptations? The hosts also celebrate their 30th episode by handing out awards to their past ten covered films, and share their current viewing habits, including The Celebration (Festen) and Deliver Me From Nowhere, while referencing Clueless, American Pie, The Breakfast Club, Milk and Cereal, and Fight Club in their discussion. Topics covered: The value of Dogme 95 filmmaking restrictions, the challenges of writing realistic high school movies, the benefits of shooting a short film in Iceland, and why some movies are highly rewatchable and enjoyable even if they aren't considered traditional masterpieces.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew journey through Charlie Chaplin's 1931 silent classic City Lights , exploring how its masterful physical comedy and intentional use of silence in the talkie era left a lasting mark on cinema. They discuss the film’s themes of optimism, wealth disparity, and the Tramp's enduring charm, and debate whether its lighthearted approach to heavy issues still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a physical challenge: How do you adapt a silent physical comedy for modern families? Could it work as an animal-focused claymation like Pingu ? What would a no-budget, Safdie Brothers-style gritty drama version look like? Would it be better as a sketch-comedy TV series in the vein of Mr. Bean or Jackass ? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Saturday Night Live and Dead Man's Wire , while referencing The Town , Singin' in the Rain , Babylon , The Great Dictator , John Q , Uncut Gems , and WALL-E in their discussion. Topics covered: The transition from silent films to talkies, crafting the perfect pratfall, the value of optimism in storytelling, picking the right director for a dinner date, and why some movies are more about the execution than the plot.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew journey through Sergio Leone's 1966 epic The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, exploring how its sprawling narrative, iconic characters, and gritty take on the Civil War changed the western genre forever. They discuss the film’s slow-building tension, its memorable dubbed dialogue, and debate whether the movie's moral ambiguity makes it a masterpiece or if it's just a stylish excuse for a gunfight. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a western challenge: How do you adapt a violent story about greed for families? Could it work as a madcap treasure hunt? What would a no-budget, wilderness-only version look like? Would it be better as an ongoing TV series exploring the characters' backstories and side quests? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Smithereens and 28 Years Later: Bone Temple, while referencing A Fistful of Dollars, Unforgiven, The Revenant, Yellowstone, No Country for Old Men, Kill Bill, Inglourious Basterds, and The Hateful Eight in their discussion. Topics covered: Handling feedback on early script drafts, the evolution of the western genre, moral ambiguity in cinema, the impact of dubbing on classic films, and why some movies benefit from a slower pace.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew take on David Fincher’s cult classic Fight Club, exploring how its stylish direction, Brad Pitt’s iconic performance, and infamous twist made it a touchstone for a generation. They analyze the film’s critique of consumerism, masculinity, and cult mentality, and debate whether the movie’s message is misunderstood or subversive. Plus, they discuss how the film’s twist holds up on repeat viewings and why it’s both a product of the 1990s and a timeless provocation. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a challenging puzzle: How do you make a dark, violent thriller family-friendly? Could it work as a coming-of-age high school sports story? What would a no-budget, one-location basement version look like? Would it be better as a TV series following the police investigation into Project Mayhem? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including The Straight Story and There There, while referencing The Boss of It All, The Graduate, Parasite, and The Big Short in their discussion. Topics covered: The legacy of 90s anti-consumerism, twist endings, the dangers of charismatic leaders, physical connection in a corporate world, and why some movies are harder to interpret than others.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew revisit the inspirational classic Dead Poets Society, exploring how Robin Williams’ passionate performance as Mr. Keating helped redefine the teacher-student movie. They discuss the film’s themes of nonconformity, tradition, and the pressures of elite education, and debate whether its “seize the day” message still resonates in a modern world. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a coming-of-age challenge: How do you adapt a story about poetry and rebellion for families? Could it work as a girls’ boarding school drama? What would a no-budget horror version look like? Would it be better as a TV series about teachers and students in different eras? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including The Fall and Rise of Reggie Dinkens and My Life (directed by Nicolas Winding Refn), while referencing Good Will Hunting, Whiplash, Stand and Deliver, The Holdovers, Lean on Me, Friday Night Lights, Breakfast Club, Sixteen Candles, Pretty in Pink, and Blair Witch in their discussion. Topics covered: The legacy of “carpe diem,” Robin Williams’ dramatic range, the evolution of school stories, the ethics of inspirational teaching, and why some movies are both timeless and of their time.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew unpack Bryan Singer's twisty 1995 crime thriller The Usual Suspects, exploring how its unreliable narrator and shocking reveals redefined the mystery genre. They analyze Verbal Kint, discuss the film's multiple layers of deception, and debate whether the movie's brilliant twists justify its narrative tricks or if it's all just an elaborate cheat. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a structural puzzle: How do you make a crime thriller family-friendly? Could it work as a school detention story? What would a no-budget interrogation room version look like? Would it be better as a TV series exploring the real Kaiser Soze story? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Hardboiled and Glengarry Glen Ross, while referencing Darth Vader, Casablanca, The Maltese Falcon, Fight Club, The Crying Game, The Sixth Sense, Citizen Kane, The Notebook, Saving Private Ryan, and Empire in their discussion. Topics covered: Unreliable narrators, twist endings, the art of misdirection, 1990s independent cinema, and whether some movies are too clever for their own good.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew journey through Stanley Kubrick’s visionary sci-fi epic 2001: A Space Odyssey, exploring how its groundbreaking visuals, enigmatic storytelling, and iconic HAL 9000 changed cinema forever. They discuss the film’s slow, meditative pace, its ambiguous ending, and why it’s more art installation than popcorn entertainment. In their remake scenarios, they face a cosmic challenge: How do you adapt Kubrick’s masterpiece for families? Could it work with a narrator? What would a no-budget version focus on? Would it be better as a multi-part Netflix series or a museum installation? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Herald and Maude and Exit 8, while referencing Star Wars, Interstellar, The Shining, Full Metal Jacket, Eyes Wide Shut, Stalker, and Planet of the Apes in their discussion. Topics covered: Visual storytelling, the evolution of science fiction, artificial intelligence, the meaning of the monolith, ambiguous endings, and why some films are more about the experience than the plot.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew take on Robert Altman’s sprawling 1975 classic Nashville, exploring how its ensemble cast and overlapping storylines create a vivid portrait of American culture at a crossroads. They discuss the film’s unconventional structure, its blend of country music and political satire, and why it feels more like a time capsule than a traditional narrative. In their remake scenarios, they face a structural challenge: How do you adapt a film with 24 main characters? Could it work as a family-friendly musical? What would a no-budget airport version look like? Would it be better as a prestige TV? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Chimes at Midnight and Veep, while also referencing The Wire, Singles, Deer Hunter, Taxi Driver, Arrested Development, and Woodstock in their analysis. Topics covered: Ensemble storytelling, the intersection of music and politics, 1970s American culture, documentary-style filmmaking, and why some movies are more historical document than entertainment.
Send us Fan Mail Peter and Andrew discuss Mike Nichols’ iconic 1967 film The Graduate, exploring how its blend of comedy, melancholy, and social commentary captured the uncertainty of a generation. They analyze Dustin Hoffman’s breakout performance, the film’s ambiguous tone, and why Benjamin Braddock’s aimlessness still resonates today. Plus, they discuss the movie’s famous Simon & Garfunkel soundtrack and its lasting influence on coming-of-age cinema. In their remake scenarios, they tackle a generational challenge: How do you adapt a story about drifting youth for modern audiences? Could it work as a family film without the affair? What would a no-budget hotel version look like? Would it be better as a TV series about finding meaning in the 21st century? The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Ready or Not 2, Something Very Bad Is Going to Happen, and The Drama, while referencing Tootsie, Risky Business, American Pie, and May December. Topics covered: The legacy of 1960s counterculture, generational drift, the evolution of the coming-of-age story, ambiguous endings, and why some films are both funny and sad.
Ranking source
Apple Podcasts rankings via the Mato Topic Intelligence Platform.
Observed September 16, 2026. Cached outside the daily freshness window; the positions keep the date they were taken on.
Apple and Apple Podcasts are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.
Pairs with
Bring this source into Mato to read its transferable patterns, then turn them into an original show for your own audience.