Podcast charts
Published by Jeremy Ryan Slate
The Jeremy Ryan Slate Show is a bi-weekly investigation into how power really works—across history, empires, and the modern world. Each episode draws on two core lenses: Hidden forces behind history —royal murders, lost colonies, financial systems, modern elites, NGOs, propaganda, and the quiet mechanisms that shape events long before they reach the headlines. And the Roman pattern —the idea that today’s crises aren’t new. Currency collapse, political division, border chaos, military overreach—Rome faced them all first. The Roman Empire spent centuries making every mistake a civilization can make, and left behind a playbook we’re following again, page by page. Through expert conversations with historians, researchers, and serious thinkers—and deep dives into primary sources, documents, and records—this show connects ancient history to modern power with evidence, not opinion. You’ll learn to: • Recognize collapse signals before they’re obvious • Understand modern crises through ancient parallels • See how empires actually rise, decay, and fall • Spot the patterns shaping what comes next From medieval conspiracies to modern cover-ups, from Augustus to Constantine, from ancient Rome to today’s global order—this is history as investigation. No spin. No narratives. Just receipts. New episodes twice a week.
On the charts
Every published chart this podcast appears in, in the snapshot behind this page. Each one links to the chart it came off.
From the feed
The latest episodes published to this podcast’s own RSS feed. Titles and descriptions are the publisher’s.
The war that nearly killed Rome wasn't fought against foreigners. It was fought against the men Rome refused to call Romans. For 100 years, Rome took the sons of its Italian allies for its legions, sent them to fight in Roman armies, buried them when it went badly — and denied them citizenship. Rome could see the problem. Reformers proposed fixing it for decades. Every one of them was killed. Then in 91 BC, Marcus Livius Drusus was assassinated at his own front door for putting Italian citizenship on the table, and the Italian allies stopped asking. They built a country. They renamed a town called Corfinium to "Italica" and made it a capital. They set up a senate of 500. They elected two consuls. They minted a coin with an Italian bull goring the Roman wolf. And they nearly destroyed Rome inside a single year. This is Episode 121 of The Fall of the Republic series on The Roman Pattern — the story of how a century of refused citizenship became a secession, how war forced Rome to grant peacefully what it had refused violently, and how the poisoned victory that ended the Social War set the fuse for Sulla to march on Rome itself. Chapters: 00:00 The war that nearly killed Rome 01:50 Where we are in the series 03:45 The arithmetic — 100 years of coalition without citizenship 06:10 Rome could see the problem 06:38 Marcus Livius Drusus the Younger 07:25 Three reformers, three deaths 07:49 The allies build a country 08:40 The Italia coin — the bull goring the wolf 09:36 Not rebellion — secession 09:59 Rome starts losing (90 BC) 10:49 Rome capitulates — the Lex Julia 12:00 The Lex Plautia Papiria — 60 days to enroll 12:43 Rome resents the concession 13:06 The tribal dilution mechanism 13:33 Publius Sulpicius Rufus and the new citizens 14:33 Sulla vs. Marius — two men each correct 14:56 Sulla at Nola with his legions 15:24 The march on Rome 16:12 Setup for next week: Sulla 16:36 The full pattern 17:24 What this means beyond Rome 17:43 When you force under fire what you refused in peace Sources referenced in this episode: — Appian, The Civil Wars, Book 1 — Diodorus Siculus (Italian confederation constitutional details) — Cicero, Pro Archia (Lex Plautia Papiria specifics) — Velleius Paterculus, Roman History — Plutarch, Life of Sulla — Livy, Periochae 71-76 — Emilio Gabba, Republican Rome, The Army and the Allies — H.H. Scullard, From the Gracchi to Nero — Ronald Syme, The Roman Revolution (1939) Sulla marches on Rome next Sunday.
A counterfactual thought experiment — a departure from the usual researched history on this channel. Thanks to subscriber @history1099 for the idea. In the real world, the Emperor Aurelian reunified a collapsing Rome, rebuilt its currency around the Unconquered Sun, and was murdered in 275 AD by his own officers over a forged kill-list — nine years before Diocletian had to redo the whole recovery. But what if the blade had missed? This is the "what if": a Rome that never fell, a world of three empires instead of a hundred nations, no America, and a war fought not with armies but on a ledger. It's a fiction — but the coin, the currency reform, and the assassination at the center of it are real. Most of my Rome work now lives on The Roman Pattern — heavily researched deep dives on the Republic, the Empire, and civilizational collapse. If you want more, that's the place: [Roman Pattern link] Chapters 0:00 – 2026: Three Empires Run the Planet 1:42 – The Premise (and the Subscriber Who Sparked It) 2:53 – Aurelian's Coin and the Unconquered Sun 3:53 – A Coin as Control: Money, Ruler, and God in One Face 5:20 – The Families Who Kept the Ledger 6:53 – Why Rome Had No Head to Cut Off 7:43 – From Parchment to a Machine Made of Light 9:09 – The Ledger Decides What's Allowed to Be True 10:03 – The Lie That Swallowed an Ocean: Britannia Never Fell 11:33 – The Resistance You're Feeling Right Now 12:23 – How China and Persia Got "Handled" 14:21 – One Shared System Across Three Empires 14:50 – The Oldest Cartel on Earth 15:34 – 2026: The War Fought on Ledgers 16:31 – How to Spot It: The Money in Your Pocket 17:39 – What Aurelian Really Survived The real history behind the counterfactual (Everything past "Aurelian survives" is invented; these cover the real Aurelian, whose reforms and murder anchor the fiction.) Alaric Watson, Aurelian and the Third Century — the standard academic account John F. White, Restorer of the World: The Roman Emperor Aurelian Kenneth Harl, Coinage in the Roman Economy — the real currency debasement and reform Zosimus, New History — primary source Historia Augusta, Life of Aurelian — primary source (use with caution; notoriously unreliable)
You don't need a bad man to destroy a republic. You need a competent one with a practical problem and a solution that works a little too well. Gaius Marius should never have mattered. He was a nobody from a hill town southeast of Rome. He clawed his way into the Senate through military competence because his family had no name and no network. And then he faced a genuine crisis — Rome literally could not fill its legions. He fixed it. He removed the property qualification that had kept the landless poor out of military service, saved Rome from Jugurtha in North Africa, and then saved Rome again from the Germanic tribes that nearly annihilated it in 105 BC. He did what nobody else could do. And the same reform that saved Rome killed the Republic 60 years later. This is the mechanism. Not the myth. The specific chain of cause and effect that turned a manpower reform into personal military armies loyal to individual generals rather than to the state — the mechanism Sulla would use in 88 BC to march on Rome, and Caesar would use in 49 BC to finish the Republic. This is Episode 119 of The Fall of the Republic series on The Roman Pattern. Chapters: 00:00 How republics actually die 01:36 Where we are in the series 02:28 Marius: the new man from Arpinum 04:34 Rome's manpower crisis — the property qualification problem 06:35 The Jugurtha War — "a city for sale" 08:07 107 BC — Marius opens the ranks 11:05 Aquae Sextiae and Vercellae — Rome saved from annihilation 15:07 The mechanism — how soldier loyalty shifted from Rome to the general 17:46 Saturninus and the first veteran land grants (103, 100 BC) 18:33 Breaking the Lex Genucia — five consecutive consulships 21:11 Sulla learns the trick 22:17 88 BC — Sulla marches on Rome 24:18 Marius flees — two ruins looking at each other 25:06 Return, purges, and 17 days 26:29 Money, Borders, Power — the three fault lines 28:17 The pattern — load-bearing constraints 30:36 Next week: Sulla Sources referenced in this episode: — Sallust, Bellum Jugurthinum — Plutarch, Life of Marius — Appian, The Civil Wars, Book 1 — Livy, Periochae 65-80 — Orosius, Histories Against the Pagans — Mary Beard, SPQR — Ronald Syme, The Roman Revolution (1939) — H.H. Scullard, From the Gracchi to Nero The Fall of the Republic series continues Monday with Sulla — the first man in Roman history to march his legions on Rome itself. Subscribe for The Roman Pattern every Monday. #Rome #MarianReforms #RomanRepublic
On July 17, 1918, the Romanov family was shot in a basement in Yekaterinburg — and most history files it under "murder." That's too small. The dynasty didn't die that night. It died in 1613, the moment the first Romanov built a state that was nothing but the Tsar: a throne with no machine underneath it, no institution that could outlive one man or reform itself while he was alive. This is the 300-year demolition — how a state built around a sacred autocrat modernized its economy, froze its politics, and left nothing to catch the crown when it finally fell. From Michael Romanov and the Time of Troubles, through Peter the Great, the serf emancipation, Bloody Sunday and the fatal October Manifesto, to a railway carriage in 1917 and a cellar in 1918. And the fault line runs through every empire that ever mistook a man for a machine. CHAPTERS 0:00 – The Romanovs Died 300 Years Before the Basement 2:01 – 1613: The Time of Troubles and a 16-Year-Old Tsar 3:42 – The Councils That Were Never Written Down 5:23 – Peter the Great: Modern Tools, Medieval Politics 6:15 – The Patrimonial State 7:23 – The 19th-Century Trap: Reform vs. Reaction 7:47 – Alexander II Frees the Serfs 8:38 – One Morning in 1881: A Signature and a Bomb 9:19 – Alexander III Slams the Door 10:45 – Nicholas II: The Wrong Man for the Century 11:56 – The Ibn Khaldun Pattern 13:42 – 1905 and Bloody Sunday 15:13 – The October Manifesto: The Fatal Half-Reform 17:08 – The Accelerants: Rasputin and the War 19:57 – February 1917: The Crown Falls Into a Vacuum 20:51 – Abdication in a Railway Carriage 22:40 – 304 Years, and the Anastasia Myth 23:55 – The Basement: Yurovsky's Own Account 26:13 – The Pattern: Every One-Man State Is a Countdown Sources & Further Reading Simon Sebag Montefiore, The Romanovs: 1613–1918 — the founding bargain and the dynastic arc Richard Pipes, Russia Under the Old Regime — the "patrimonial state" argument Orlando Figes, A People's Tragedy — society outrunning the crown Dominic Lieven, The End of Tsarist Russia — the war as accelerant Ibn Khaldun, The Muqaddimah — the cyclical (asabiyya) frame Leon Trotsky, History of the Russian Revolution — primary source, used critically on February 1917 Yakov Yurovsky's account — the executioner's own record of the night
You don't need a tyrant to kill a republic. You just need permission. 133 BC. The Capitol. Broken benches, snapped legs, senators pouring out of a meeting to attack an election already underway. For more than three and a half centuries — since the tribune of the plebs was created around 494 BC — no sitting tribune had been touched by his own government, let alone killed. Tribunes were sacrosanct, physically untouchable under Roman law. If you laid a hand on one, any Roman citizen could legally kill you for it. That protection was written into the Constitution specifically to shield ordinary Romans from the Senate. On the day Tiberius Gracchus stood for reelection, that protection dissolved in about ten minutes. Scipio Nasica — Rome's Pontifex Maximus, its own chief priest — led a group of senators out of the meeting where they'd just failed to persuade the consul to act. They snapped the legs off their own benches. They walked to where the assembly was gathering. They beat Tiberius Gracchus and about 300 of his supporters to death, and threw his body into the Tiber like a criminal. The moment the first bench leg came down on his skull, the Roman Republic entered a phase it would never leave. Every Roman strongman who came after — Marius, Sulla, Caesar — could look back at this one afternoon and say the same thing: it's already been done. But here's what most treatments miss: Tiberius Gracchus was RIGHT about the problem. The land crisis was real. The recruiting collapse was real. The illegally-held ager publicus was real. What killed the Republic wasn't the reform itself. It was the specific way he pushed it through, and the specific way the Senate chose to answer. This is Episode 3 of the "Fall of the Roman Republic" series and the first specific case episode after Ep 113 (the system explained) and Ep 115 (the 100-year framework primer). Every subsequent episode traces one more layer breaking off the same structure that cracks right here in 133 BC. CHAPTERS: 00:00 The Day the Roman Senate Killed One of Its Own 04:25 The First Stone Falls Out of the Arch 05:36 Who Tiberius Gracchus Actually Was (Cornelia's Son, Scipio's Grandson) 07:00 The Empty Countryside That Radicalized Him 09:22 The Land Reform That Wasn't Even Radical 12:03 The Octavius Veto: The Senate Breaks the First Norm 14:32 Deposing Octavius: Tiberius Answers by Breaking Another 15:46 The Re-election Bid That Sealed His Fate 16:33 Scipio Nasica Leads the Killing on the Capitol 17:45 Why Every Roman Warlord After This Cites 133 BC 19:05 Money, Borders, Power: The Framework Applied 22:34 Next: Gaius Gracchus and the Escalation Sources & further reading: Plutarch, Life of Tiberius Gracchus — the specific killing details (bench legs, 300 supporters, body in Tiber), Octavius as a large ager publicus holder Appian, The Civil Wars, Book 1 — the "first internal Roman quarrel settled by murder inside the city" framing Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome — the argument that Tiberius's actual program was conservative, and the ferocity of reaction was what was radical David Stockton, The Gracchi — the specialist monograph on the brothers Erich Gruen, The Last Generation of the Roman Republic — the definitive scholarly account of the Republic's decline Andrew Lintott, Violence in Republican Rome — for the specific pattern of political violence becoming normal Tom Holland, Rubicon: The Last Years of the Roman Republic — accessible narrative of the fall Livy, Periochae — the surviving summary for this period
When Alexander the Great died in 323 BC with no heir, his generals tore his empire apart in a single decade. One of them — Ptolemy — took the strangest piece of all, Egypt, and turned it into a dynasty that outlasted Alexander by nearly 300 years. He didn't rule as a conqueror. He put on the pharaoh's crown, funded the old temples, engineered a brand-new god, and made a Greek bloodline from Macedon look like the rightful heirs to 3,000 years of Egyptian kingship. This is the continuity playbook — the exact method every occupying power since, from Augustus's Rome to British India to the modern IMF, has used to make conquest look like continuity. Conquest ends. Legitimacy has to be renewed every single day. Chapters 0:00 – Alexander's Empire Was a Countdown 2:33 – Alexander Dies in Babylon With No Heir 3:46 – The Wars of the Diadochi 4:31 – Ptolemy Takes the Strangest Piece: Egypt 5:13 – Stealing Alexander's Corpse 6:07 – A Greek General Becomes Pharaoh (305 BC) 7:29 – The Legitimacy Playbook: Regalia & the Priesthood 8:33 – Sibling Marriage & the Invented God Serapis 9:59 – Two Laws, One Kingdom 11:00 – The Library of Alexandria as Soft Power 11:56 – The Dynasty Turns Brutal 13:39 – How Egypt Became Rome's Client State 14:31 – Cleopatra VII, the Last Ptolemy 16:50 – Actium and the Fall of Egypt 17:15 – Augustus Runs Ptolemy's Playbook 19:37 – The Same Trick: British India, French North Africa, the IMF 21:12 – Why Legitimacy Beats Conquest Sources & Further Reading Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca Historica — the funeral-cart / corpse interception Justin, Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus — Ptolemy VIII Physcon Plutarch, Life of Antony — Cleopatra's languages and self-presentation Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome — Rome ruling through local systems William Dalrymple, The Anarchy — the East India Company / princely-state model Günther Hölbl, A History of the Ptolemaic Empire — the standard modern scholarly account
Rome didn't fall to conquest. It killed itself over 100 years, one broken norm at a time. The Roman Republic held together for nearly 500 years through a system of layered checks and balances (that's the previous episode). This video is the framework for how that system came apart — from 133 BC, when Tiberius Gracchus was beaten to death by his own Senate, to 27 BC, when Augustus quietly renamed himself and became the first emperor. Ronald Syme's "The Roman Revolution" (1939) is the intellectual scaffolding for this whole Republic series. Syme's argument, in essence: the last 100 years of the Roman Republic weren't a class war or a foreign invasion — they were a slow-motion suicide. A sequence of political-military strongmen each breaking more laws than the man before them, until there was no Republic left to defend. This episode is a primer, not a deep-dive. It walks quickly through every major figure in the arc — Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, Marius, Sulla, Pompey, Caesar, Augustus — to give you the shape of what's coming in the rest of the Republic series. Every subsequent episode will take one of these figures and go deep on how they specifically broke the layer of the system they broke. Understand these 100 years and you won't be watching history anymore. You'll be looking in a mirror. CHAPTERS: 00:00 Empires Don't Die of Murder — They Die of Suicide 02:47 Why We're Going Back to the Republic 03:21 The Ronald Syme Framework (The Roman Revolution) 05:46 133 BC: Tiberius Gracchus and the First Political Killing 11:20 Gaius Marius: 7 Consulships and the Broken Rules 13:09 Sulla: Dictator, Proscriptions, and the Reformed Senate 17:36 Pompey the Great Rises 19:24 Julius Caesar: Broke Patrician to First Triumvir 22:12 The Consulship of Julius and Caesar (59 BC) 23:48 The Gallic Wars and Crossing the Rubicon (49 BC) 29:02 The Second Triumvirate and Actium 31:05 The Word Salad That Created the Principate SOURCES & FURTHER READING: Ronald Syme, The Roman Revolution (1939) — the central framework the whole series is built on Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome — for Roman institutional context and the mos maiorum framework Tom Holland, Rubicon: The Last Years of the Roman Republic — the accessible narrative of the fall Erich Gruen, The Last Generation of the Roman Republic — the definitive modern scholarly account of the decline Plutarch, Lives — the biographical primary source for Tiberius Gracchus, Marius, Sulla, Pompey, Caesar Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars — for Caesar and Augustus specifically Cassius Dio, Roman History — for the late Republic and Augustan period Appian, The Civil Wars — Book 1 explicitly frames the Gracchi as the beginning of the civil wars #RomanRepublic #FallOfTheRomanRepublic #JuliusCaesar #Augustus #RomanRevolution #RonaldSyme #TheRomanPattern
Nobody toppled Charlemagne's empire with a sword. Nobody burned it down with a torch. It was taken apart with a law. Most history counts the battles. This channel reads the contracts. You've been told Charlemagne's empire just fell apart — his sons fought, the Vikings came, the center broke. That version is true as far as it goes. It's just far too small. The real weapon was Frankish partible inheritance — a legal custom built for chieftains splitting up cattle and hillforts. In 843 it got applied to an empire that ran from the Atlantic to the Elbe. The lawyers were ready for it. The parchment was drawn up. The seals were stamped. The Treaty of Verdun gets remembered as a peace agreement. What it really was, was an estate-planning contract written at the scale of a civilization — negotiated by teams of church lawyers, notaries, financial administrators, and surveyors who spent months calculating fiscal revenues and drawing ecclesiastical circuits. They thought they were doing estate planning. They were also, without having any idea of it, doing nation building. France and Germany begin at Verdun. Nobody conquered Charlemagne's empire. They inherited it. And inheriting it broke it into pieces. ════════════════════════════ 📚 SOURCES ▪ Einhard — Vita Karoli Magni (contemporary biography of Charlemagne) ▪ Nithard — Histories (Charlemagne's grandson, eyewitness chronicler of the civil wars) ▪ Tom Holland — Millennium (cited in-video on how Carolingian inheritance shaped medieval Europe) ▪ Chris Wickham — The Inheritance of Rome (cited in-video on administrative divergence) ▪ Rosamond McKitterick — Charlemagne: The Formation of a European Identity ▪ Janet Nelson — King and Emperor: A New Life of Charlemagne ▪ Ibn Khaldun — Muqaddimah (dynastic decline theory) ════════════════════════════ 🎧 Available on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify. 🎯 RELATED EPISODES ▪ The Habsburg Jaw: Why the Empire That Ruled the World Couldn't Chew ▪ Napoleon Didn't Take Power. France Voted To Give It To Him. ▪ The Wars of the Roses: How England's Aristocracy Destroyed Itself in 30 Years 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more Hidden Forces in History. ════════════════════════════ ⏱ CHAPTERS 00:00 The Empire Wasn't Destroyed by War 01:49 What Charlemagne Actually Built 04:24 The 806 Plan That Never Ran 06:39 Louis the Pious and the Battle Over Frankish Law 09:16 The Sons' Rebellion Against Their Father 12:22 Fontenoy 841 — The Frankish Civil War 16:32 Verdun 843 — When Lawyers Divided a Continent 21:00 Lotharingia and the 1,000-Year Contested Frontier 27:36 Same Playbook, Different Century
NOTE: two editors notes were left in this episode. A YouTube viewer caught it and shared the timestamps with me. Two hours after release, we fixed and swapped the file, but your device may not have updated if it auto-downloaded on release. In 216 BC, at a place called Cannae, Rome lost 50,000 men in a single afternoon. Along with 80 senators, one of the two sitting consuls, both quaestors, and 29 military tribunes, all gone in the space of a few hours. Any monarchy in that position sues for peace. Any dictatorship reorganizes. Any modern government panics. Rome refused to even send an ambassador. They elected new magistrates, raised new legions (some made up of slaves offered their freedom), and the assemblies kept meeting. The tribunes kept using their veto. And the whole thing just kept running. That wasn't toughness. It was engineering. The Roman Republic wasn't a democracy — it was a machine specifically built to survive catastrophic failure at any single point. Two consuls with veto power over each other. Ten tribunes with veto power over almost anything. A Senate that couldn't legislate. Assemblies that could. Unwritten customs (mos maiorum) with more binding force than written law. Patron-client networks that ran in parallel to the formal state. Every layer had a backup. When one failed, three others held. That system ran for nearly 500 years. Then, over about a century, the layers weakened one at a time, not because the Romans got dumber, but because the pressures grew faster than the system could adapt. This is Episode 1 of "The Fall of the Roman Republic" series. It's the foundation you need before you can watch the machine break in every subsequent episode. If you don't understand how the intact system worked, none of the failures will land. CHAPTERS: 00:00 The Battle of Cannae — Why Rome Didn't Collapse 03:11 What the Roman Republic Actually Wasn't 05:26 The Assemblies: Where Laws Actually Got Made 08:44 The Senate's Real Power (It Wasn't Legislation) 11:01 The Consuls: Engineered Against Kingship 13:31 The Tribunes: The Sacrosanct Veto Weapon 15:38 Cursus Honorum and Mos Maiorum: The Filters 20:57 The Dictatorship: Rome's Kill Switch (Cincinnatus) 23:04 Patron-Client Networks: The Invisible Layer 25:51 The Three Pressures That Would Break Everything 33:37 Setting Up Tiberius Gracchus (133 BC) SOURCES Polybius, Histories, Book 6, the ancient tutorial on the Roman "mixed constitution," the recovery from Cannae as proof the design worked Livy, Ab Urbe Condita, Varro's return to Rome after Cannae ("thanked because he had not despaired of the Republic"), the Cincinnatus story Plutarch, Life of Tiberius Gracchus, the killing scene on the Capitol Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, the res publica meaning, the tension between "public thing" and "everyone governs" Andrew Lintott, The Constitution of the Roman Republic, the definitive modern reference on institutional structure Fergus Millar, The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic, how the assemblies actually functioned Tom Holland, Rubicon: The Last Years of the Roman Republic, the accessible narrative of the collapse this series will trace
Every schoolchild in the English-speaking world learns William the Conqueror's name. What most of them never hear is that William spent his final years bitter about another Norman knight — a man his own contemporaries considered the more accomplished conqueror of their generation. His name was Robert Guiscard. He was born to a minor noble family in Normandy with too many sons and too little land. He arrived in Southern Italy as a bandit stealing horses in Calabria. Twenty years later he was Duke of Apulia, had defeated the Byzantine Emperor in battle, and was planning to march on Constantinople itself. When William landed at Hastings in 1066, Guiscard had already been ruling more Italian territory for seven years than William would ever hold in England. And Guiscard wasn't alone. He was one of twelve brothers. Between them, the sons of a minor Norman lord named Tancred de Hauteville built the Kingdom of Sicily — a multicultural state employing Muslim scholars, Byzantine bureaucrats, and Latin monks in the same government. From Robert Guiscard's ducal title in 1059 to Napoleon's dissolution of the kingdom in 1816, that political architecture ran for 725 years. Today I'm joined by Memory Medieval to walk through the Norman conquest history didn't teach you. Follow Memory Medieval on X: @MemoryMedieval Substack: memorymedieval.substack.com Feigned Flight publication: feignedflight.com ════════════════════════════ 🎧 Available on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify. 🎯 RELATED EPISODES ▪ Beyond Hastings: The Brutal Reality of the Norman Takeover (the English Norman conquest with David Manor) ▪ The Habsburg Jaw: Why the Empire That Ruled the World Couldn't Chew ▪ Napoleon Didn't Take Power. France Voted To Give It To Him. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more Hidden Forces in History. ════════════════════════════ ⏱ CHAPTERS 00:00 History Remembers the Wrong Norman 06:08 Southern Italy in 1030 — The Vacuum 08:43 The Hauteville Family and the Twelve-Sons Problem 12:14 The First Wave — Rainulf, William Iron Arm, and Civitate 27:37 Robert Guiscard — Bandit to Duke 32:31 The Sicily Campaign and the Byzantine Wars 39:27 Why William the Conqueror Was Jealous of Guiscard 45:14 Roger II and the Multicultural Kingdom of Palermo 48:12 Frederick II and the 725-Year Inheritance ════════════════════════════
Rome didn't fall because it ran out of great men. It fell because it reached a point where being great simply wasn't enough anymore. Marcus Aurelius was arguably the most competent emperor Rome ever produced. Stoic philosopher trained from childhood. Disciplined administrator. Physically brave general who spent over a decade personally commanding the Danube frontier through the winters. If you designed a system to produce the ideal leader, Marcus is what it looks like when the system works exactly right. And during his reign (161-180 AD), all three fault lines of the Roman system opened at the same time for the first time in history. The Antonine Plague — likely smallpox — arrived in 165 and killed somewhere between 5 and 10% of the empire, hitting the army disproportionately. The Marcomannic Wars broke on the Danube in 166 and never stopped for the rest of his life. In 175, one of his own most trusted generals declared himself emperor on nothing more than a false rumor that Marcus had died. Marcus responded exactly right at every turn. He sold imperial jewelry to pay soldiers rather than debase the currency. He held the frontier personally for a decade. He put down the Cassius revolt without civil war. He knew, from his Stoic training and his study of Roman history, exactly what was happening to him. And he still couldn't stop it. This is Episode 111 — the transitional episode between the "Life After the Fall of Rome" series and the upcoming Roman Republic series. It's the moment where the pattern first becomes visible at the peak of the empire. And the answer to "why couldn't Marcus stop it" is: the fault lines were built into the Roman model centuries before Marcus was born. To understand where they came from, we have to go back to the Republic. That's where we're headed next. CHAPTERS: 00:00 The Philosopher-Emperor Writing While Losing 03:11 The Peak Marcus Inherited (Adoption Succession) 06:17 The Three Fault Lines Open at Once (161 AD) 06:41 Money: The Antonine Plague Breaks the Economy 09:58 Borders: The Marcomannic Wars Begin 12:57 Power: The Avidius Cassius Revolt (175 AD) 14:55 Why Marcus Could See the Pattern 16:24 The Meditations as a Diagnostic Document 18:07 Commodus: The Succession Failure 22:06 The 23-Year Record: Right Decisions, Wrong Direction 24:32 Modern Parallel: Competent People in Failing Systems 26:31 What Comes Next: Back to the Republic SOURCES Marcus Aurelius, Meditations — Books 2, 4, 6, and 12 — the private notebooks written on campaign Cassius Dio, Roman History — Books 71-72 covering Marcus's reign, contemporary-adjacent Historia Augusta — "Life of Marcus Aurelius" — later and often unreliable but useful for details like the Trajan Forum auction Anthony Birley — Marcus Aurelius: A Biography — the definitive modern biography, thorough on campaigns and succession Mary Beard — SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome — for the sharp point on adoption succession being biology-driven rather than principled Kyle Harper — The Fate of Rome — essential for the Antonine Plague context and demographic collapse argument Peter Heather — The Fall of the Roman Empire — for the ongoing money/borders/power framework consistency Walter Scheidel — demographic modeling of the Antonine Plague
Henry VIII didn't break with Rome for faith. He broke with it for property. That's the part most history books leave in the margins. The standard story is that Henry wanted a divorce, Rome said no, and England broke away. But the real prize was never the marriage. It was sitting behind the monastery walls — land, silver, grain, charters, deeds — the largest concentrated wealth in England, waiting for a monarch with the administrative capacity to take it. Henry VII spent twenty-four years building that capacity. Bonds and recognizances that held roughly half the English peerage financially hostage. The Council Learned in the Law. The Chamber finance system. A government that could measure, monitor, and enforce. Then Cromwell arrived at court and recognized what his father-figure Wolsey had been extending — that the machinery pointed at the nobility could be pointed at the Church instead. The Valor Ecclesiasticus of 1535 catalogued every religious house in England. The Court of Augmentations was purpose-built in 1536 to process the seizure. Between 1536 and 1540, roughly £1.3 million in monastic wealth transferred to the Crown — more than Henry VII had left in the entire treasury. Henry VII built the engine. Cromwell found the target. Henry VIII pulled the lever. ════════════════════════════ 📚 SOURCES ▪ G.R. Elton — England Under the Tudors and Reform and Renewal (the foundational "Tudor Revolution in Government" thesis)▪ Diarmaid MacCulloch — Thomas Cromwell: A Revolutionary Life ▪ J.R. Lander — research on bonds and recognizances under Henry VII▪ Peter Marshall — Heretics and Believers: A History of the English Reformation ▪ Eamon Duffy — The Stripping of the Altars (the Catholic counter-narrative) ════════════════════════════ 🎧 Available on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify. 🎯 RELATED EPISODES▪ Henry VII: The Tax Accountant Who Reinvented the English Monarchy (the engine that made all of this possible)▪ The Wars of the Roses: How England's Aristocracy Destroyed Itself in 30 Years (the collapse that started the Tudor century)▪ The Habsburg Jaw: Why the Empire That Ruled the World Couldn't Chew ════════════════════════════ ⏱ CHAPTERS 00:00 The Reformation Wasn't About Faith. It Was About Property. 02:37 The Machine Henry VIII Inherited From His Father 06:44 The Financial Crisis That Cracked the System 09:20 The King's Great Matter Meets Thomas Cromwell 12:22 The Legal Break — Parliament Rewrites the Rules 15:48 The Valor Ecclesiasticus — Auditing the Church 20:24 The Pilgrimage of Grace and the Test of the System 24:24 The Court of Augmentations and Property as Loyalty3 3:34 Same Playbook, Different Century ════════════════════════════
The Roman pattern didn't end with Rome. It just kept running at a smaller scale. Everywhere the Western Empire had held together — Hispania, Gaul, North Africa, Italy, Britain — the political form gave out, but the substance didn't disappear. It fragmented, reassembled, and kept running the same three-part pattern at a new scale: money weakens the center, borders get harder to defend, and power drifts from institutions to individuals. That's the kill chain. And every post-Roman kingdom ran it, in slightly different form, over the next three centuries. By 800 AD, a Frankish king was crowned Emperor of the Romans by a pope who was still running what was left of Roman administration. 324 years after the "fall." The empire hadn't come back. It had been transformed — Roman memory fused with post-Roman military and economic power, held together by the Church. This is the finale of the "Life After the Fall of Rome" series. It's the synthesis of every argument the series has made: what actually happens when a civilization ends. And it's the setup for what comes next — because the Roman pattern didn't start with the fall. It started centuries earlier in the Republic. That's where we're going next. CHAPTERS: 00:00 The Roman Pattern Didn't End with Rome 02:03 Money, Borders, Power: The Three Fault Lines 08:32 Visigothic Hispania: Religion as a Political Wall 15:06 Frankish Gaul: The Most Successful Adaptation 22:27 North Africa: Vandals, Byzantines, and Arabs 28:13 Lombard Italy: Decentralization as Survival 33:23 Anglo-Saxon Britain: The Frontier That Collapsed First 38:21 The Papacy: How the Church Kept the Substance 41:13 The Byzantine East: The Roman System That Survived 47:38 800 AD: Charlemagne Becomes Emperor of the Romans 51:24 The Modern Question: Money, Borders, Power Today 1:00:33 Where the Pattern Started: The Republic SOURCES Peter Heather — The Fall of the Roman Empire (2006) — the argument that barbarian kingdoms were assembled from Roman parts, not opposed to Rome Mary Beard — the "lights went out" version of the fall was largely invented by later generations Brian Ward-Perkins — The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization (2005) — the archaeological evidence for material collapse, especially in Britain Procopius — History of the Wars — Belisarius's secretary, firsthand witness to the Vandal War and Justinian's Italian campaigns The Corpus Juris Civilis (Justinian Code, compiled 530s) — the surviving Roman legal framework
Henry VII rebuilt England with a ledger instead of a sword. The myth remembers him as a cautious survivor of the Wars of the Roses — a miser, a tax collector, the kind of king who was nervous about the battlefield. But that's the small version of the story. The real machine ran on parchment, bonds, wool customs, royal seals, and the rolls the sheriffs kept. Henry filled his government with "new men" — administrators he picked for their command of the law and for their loyalty. A body called the Council Learned in the Law took ordinary promises and turned them into debts you could actually enforce. Noble privilege started to become a liability. Loyalty turned into a bill with a seal on it. That was the Tudor revolution. It looked less like a new crown and more like a new collection system. The monarchy stopped waiting around for obedience and started pricing it. Everything Henry VIII did — the break with Rome, the dissolution of the monasteries — was only possible because his father had built a state powerful enough to do it. The founder of the durable political order is almost never the charismatic figure history remembers. It's the accountant. ═══════════════════════════════ 📚 SOURCES ▪ S.B. Chrimes — Henry VII (the standard biographical account) ▪ Stephen Gunn — Henry VII's New Men and the Making of Tudor England ▪ J.R. Lander — "bonds, coercion, and fear" (the phrase that defined the system) ▪ John Guy — Tudor England (Henry's foreign policy as royal accounts) ▪ Sean Cunningham — Henry VII ═══════════════════════════════ 🎧 Available on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify. 🎯 RELATED EPISODES ▪ The Wars of the Roses: How England's Aristocracy Destroyed Itself in 30 Years (the wreckage he inherited) ▪ The Habsburg Jaw: Why the Empire That Ruled the World Couldn't Chew ▪ Napoleon Didn't Take Power. France Voted To Give It To Him. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more Hidden Forces in History. ═══════════════════════════════ ⏱ CHAPTERS 00:00 The Ledger, Not the Sword 02:22 Legitimacy After Bosworth and the Marriage That Sealed It 07:15 Building a Permanent Revenue System 11:24 Bonds, Coercion, and Fear 13:31 The "New Men" — Morton, Bray, and the Administrative State 17:22 Making Rebellion Visible and Expensive 23:15 Empson, Dudley, and the Cold Edge of Administration 26:20 Same Playbook, Different Century
The Roman Empire didn't really fall. It just changed its uniform. In September of 590, Rome was down to 30,000 people rattling around inside a city built for a million. The Lombards were at the gates. No army, no treasury, no functioning administration. Just one man — Gregory, the new pope — negotiating with the Lombards, feeding the city out of church granaries, and paying the soldiers with church silver. The Empire couldn't do any of it anymore. The Church could. That's the moment the transfer completes. Not through conquest or revolution — through vacancy. The Church had spent two centuries growing inside the Roman administrative apparatus: adopting the Roman geographic grid, seating bishops as civil judges, running the grain supply. When the political form gave out, the substance migrated to the institution still doing the work. This is Episode 5 of the "Life After the Fall of Rome" series — the capstone argument. The evidence is hiding in plain sight: Christian basilicas are literally repurposed Roman civic buildings. Church vocabulary (diocese, parish, pontiff, cardinal) is Roman administrative terminology. Western property law still runs on Justinian's Code. The Catholic Church is the longest-continuously-operating Roman institution on Earth. ▶️ START HERE — Episode 1: "Rome Didn't Fall" https://youtu.be/iHvJUx1cNSQ?si=E2RiiMtquuar9N6t ▶️ Full playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtUC344qk-mpdez1lz7Gd6kLrhehvVX_E ▶️ Vatican companion episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdksZGOXVeY #FallOfRome #CatholicChurch #RomanEmpire #PopeGregory #ChurchHistory #TheRomanPattern CHAPTERS: 00:00 Rome Didn't Fall — It Just Changed Its Uniform 02:05 Rome Was Held Together by Administration, Not Armies 05:35 313 AD: Constantine Integrates the Church 07:40 The Church Adopts the Roman Grid 09:02 Bishops Take Over Governance 12:03 The Monasteries as Rome's Backup Drives 14:53 Gregory the Great and the Lombards at the Gates (590) 18:11 Why the Barbarian Kings Needed the Church 23:09 The Evidence Hiding in Plain Sight 24:33 Political Forms Change — Substance Migrates
The autopsy of Charles II of Spain found a heart the size of a peppercorn, corroded lungs, and a brain reduced to a liquid state. He was a man who couldn't chew, hadn't walked until age eight, and whose own physicians decided witchcraft was the most plausible diagnosis. Most history books read that as tragedy. On this channel, we read it as a balance sheet. The Habsburg motto was Bella gerant alii, tu felix Austria nube — "Let others wage war; you, happy Austria, marry." That wasn't romance. It was an operating manual. For 200 years, the family built the world's first global empire by turning marriage contracts into property deeds. And then they couldn't stop. Two centuries of cousin and uncle-niece marriages produced a king with an inbreeding coefficient higher than a full sibling union — the mathematical endpoint of a consolidation strategy that couldn't be modified without dissolving the empire it built. The Habsburg jaw wasn't a genetic curiosity. It was the state itself becoming physically unable to feed the population it ruled. ═══════════════════════════════ 📚 SOURCES ▪ Alvarez, Ceballos, Quinteiro — "The Role of Inbreeding in the Extinction of a European Royal Dynasty" (PLOS ONE, 2009) ▪ J.H. Elliott — Imperial Spain 1469-1716 and The Count-Duke of Olivares ▪ Henry Kamen — Philip II of Spain ▪ Paul Kennedy — The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers ▪ Ibn Khaldun — Muqaddimah ═══════════════════════════════ 🎧 Available on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify. 🎯 RELATED EPISODES ▪ Napoleon Didn't Take Power. France Voted To Give It To Him. ▪ Augustus Caesar: How One Man Killed the Roman Republic ▪ The Custom That Killed the American Republic 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more Hidden Forces in History. ═══════════════════════════════ ⏱ CHAPTERS 00:00 The Autopsy of a King Who Couldn't Chew 02:08 How the Habsburgs Built an Empire Without Fighting 05:35 Charles V and the First Global Empire 07:47 The Genetics of a Closed System 10:06 Philip II Marries His Niece and the System Locks In 13:47 The Validos: When the Crown Can't Rule 16:23 Charles II: The Product of 200 Years of Consolidation 23:44 The Empire Fragments in 18 Months 25:34 The Pattern: What Any Closed System Eventually Produces
Everywhere Rome fell, civilization transformed. In Britain, it stopped. That's not a myth. That's what actually happened. Everywhere else the empire fell — Gaul, Hispania, Italy, North Africa — the barbarian successor kingdoms absorbed Roman administration and kept the machine running. The Franks kept Roman law. The Visigoths kept the Christian church. The Ostrogoths kept the Senate and the aqueducts. Even the Vandals in North Africa kept Roman urban life going. In Britain, none of that happened. The Roman garrisons pulled out in 407. The emperor told the Britons to defend themselves in 410. And when the Anglo-Saxons arrived, they didn't do what every other post-Roman successor group did. They didn't inherit. They built wooden halls next to abandoned Roman villas and let the villas fall down. Latin didn't evolve into a Romance language the way it did in Gaul and Hispania — it just vanished. Christianity didn't survive the transition — Pope Gregory the Great had to send Augustine of Canterbury in 597 to start over from pagan ground. Cities didn't get built on top of the old Roman ones — they got built somewhere else while Colchester sat empty for centuries. This is Episode 4 of the "Life After the Fall of Rome" series. Britain is the comparison case for the whole thesis. Everywhere else Rome fell, it transformed. Britain is the exception that proves the rule — the one place where the Hollywood version of the fall (villas abandoned, libraries lost, languages disappeared, lights actually going out) turned out to be true. And the reason it happened is quieter and more dangerous than any invasion narrative: successors who chose not to inherit. The barbarians didn't destroy Roman Britain. Roman Britain was already failing on its own. What the Anglo-Saxons did was build something entirely different on top of it — a new culture with no interest in preserving what came before. That indifference, more than any battle, is what real collapse actually looks like. If you're new to the series, start with Episode 1 ("Rome Didn't Fall — Here's What Actually Happened") linked below. 🎬 CHAPTERS 00:00 — Everywhere Rome Fell, Civilization Transformed. In Britain, It Stopped. 00:59 — Welcome to The Roman Pattern 02:38 — Year 200: Roman Britain at Its Peak 04:23 — The Army Was the Operating System 04:51 — 407 AD: Constantine III Strips the Garrisons 05:16 — 410 AD: Honorius Tells Britain to Defend Itself 06:34 — The Sub-Roman Attempt to Hold It Together 07:55 — Maintenance Failure: The Slow Decline 09:00 — The Anglo-Saxons Arrive 10:40 — Why Their Situation Was Different from Everywhere Else 11:23 — Replacement, Not Invasion 11:49 — King Arthur and the Battle of Badon Hill (c. 500 AD) 14:21 — The Central Question: Why Only Britain? 14:48 — Institutional Depth (Peter Heather's Argument) 15:41 — The Successor Problem 16:03 — The Cultural Gap 17:18 — The Choice to Inherit 17:42 — What It Means for a Language to Disappear 19:03 — Old English Replaces Latin 20:23 — The Knowledge Chain Breaks 20:50 — Colchester: What Total Collapse Looks Like (Brian Ward-Perkins) 22:48 — When Specialists Scatter, Cities Die 23:39 — Christianity Vanishes in the Anglo-Saxon East 25:25 — Pope Gregory's Missionaries Start from Scratch (597 AD) 26:12 — What Real Collapse Actually Means 28:15 — The Successor Question for Every Civilization 30:38 — The Hollywood Version of the Fall Was True — In One Place
The French Revolution didn't end in tyranny. It invented a new kind. History calls Napoleon a genius. That story isn't wrong — it's just incomplete. The real engine wasn't genius. It was architecture. Ballot boxes surrounded by bayonets. Referendums written before the votes were cast. Prefects in every province. Bonds that turned rich men into loyalty machines. Then Louis Napoleon ran the same playbook forty years later — a December coup, a midnight constitution, and Haussmann's boulevards designed for troop movement, not just beauty. The Bonapartes didn't seize power. They built a machine that asked the people to hand it over and engineered only one possible answer. This video walks the full autopsy — the five architectural pieces that held plebiscitary empire together, why Waterloo didn't kill the template, and what the modern version of the same machine looks like. ═══════════════════════════════ 📚 SOURCES ▪ Claude Langlois — historical work on the 1799 plebiscite returns ▪ Philip Dwyer — Napoleon: The Path to Power ▪ Sudhir Hazareesingh — The Legend of Napoleon ▪ Alexis de Tocqueville — Recollections ▪ Karl Marx — The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte ▪ Roger Price — The French Second Empire ▪ David P. Jordan — Transforming Paris: The Life and Labors of Baron Haussmann ═══════════════════════════════ 🎧 Available on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify. 🎯 RELATED EPISODES ▪ Yellow Journalism: The Architecture of Modern Manipulation ▪ The Custom That Killed the American Republic ▪ Augustus Caesar: How One Man Killed the Roman Republic 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more Hidden Forces in History. ═══════════════════════════════ ⏱ CHAPTERS 00:00 They Didn't Seize Power. They Built a Machine. 02:31 What "Plebiscitary Empire" Actually Means 04:26 The Five Pieces of the Machine 12:35 Why Waterloo Didn't Kill the Template 14:47 Louis Napoleon's Coup and the "Yes-Only" Ballot 16:06 Haussmann's Paris and the Railway State 20:17 Sedan and the Collapse 23:14 The Modern Version of the Same Machine 24:56 The Real Takeaway ═══════════════════════════════
Rome wasn't killed by its enemies. It was killed by a rescue. Everyone knows the fall of Rome — 476, the last emperor, the barbarian king, the lights going out. Almost nobody knows what happened when the Eastern Empire under Justinian tried to take Italy back. The Gothic Wars of 535-554 emptied the peninsula. Milan — one of the great cities of the north — was leveled, its men slaughtered, its women and children enslaved. Rome itself was besieged over and over. The aqueducts were cut for the first time in the city's history. And the Plague of Justinian rode the exact same roads Belisarius had reopened for trade, killing perhaps a third of the Mediterranean world. By the time Justinian declared victory in 554, Rome held maybe 50,000 people — down from hundreds of thousands under Theodoric. There was almost no one left to govern. So the Pope started doing it. Not because God willed it — because no one else was left standing. This is Episode 3 of the "Life After the Fall of Rome" series. We're going to follow the 20-year kill chain from Justinian's decision to reconquer Italy through Belisarius's early successes, the sieges, Milan's destruction, the plague, the Gothic king Totila appealing directly to Italians against their supposed "liberators," and the arrival of the Lombards in 568 who found an Italy that 20 years of Byzantine reconquest had prepared for them. The barbarians took the crown in 476. The Eastern Empire took the civilization in 554. And the pattern is closer to an operating manual for every rescue operation that's ever been launched: when a government tries to restore something that no longer exists, it doesn't bring back the past — it destroys what's left. If you're new, start with Episode 1 ("Rome Didn't Fall — Here's What Actually Happened") and Episode 2 ("Theoderic: The Goth Who Kept Rome Alive for 33 Years") linked below. 🎬 CHAPTERS 00:00 — Rome Wasn't Killed by Its Enemies — It Was Killed by a Rescue 01:44 — Welcome to The Roman Pattern 02:09 — Italy in 535 Wasn't a Burned-Out Ruin 04:16 — Who Justinian Actually Was 06:03 — Belisarius Takes Africa in 14 Months 06:56 — The Gothic War Opens (535) 08:16 — Belisarius Walks Into Rome (536) 09:06 — The Siege of Rome — Aqueducts Cut for the First Time 10:13 — The Kill Chain: Why Slow Wars Kill Everything 12:13 — The Destruction of Milan (539) 14:03 — Procopius's Three Books and the Secret History 14:51 — The Plague of Justinian (541) 16:43 — Belisarius Recalled — Totila Retakes Rome 17:38 — Italians Choose the Gothic King Over Their "Liberators" 18:27 — Narses Ends the War (552–554) 18:54 — What Justinian Actually Restored: Rome at 50,000 20:20 — The Lombards Arrive (568) 22:01 — The Church Inherits the Empty Space 22:29 — Gregory the Great and the Medieval Papacy Begin 23:46 — The Pragmatic Sanction and the Administrative Ghost of Empire 27:08 — Justinian Wasn't Evil — The Pattern Is 29:57 — The Date Isn't 476. It's 554. 30:19 — The Friend Who Shows Up With a Plan to Save It
History tells us the Wars of the Roses was a chivalric struggle between two great houses that ended with Henry Tudor's victory at Bosworth and the dawn of the Tudor age. That's the cover story. What actually happened across 30 years — between 1455 and 1487 — was something much darker. Two cousin lineages of the same royal family, Lancaster and York, fought a sequence of battles that didn't just transfer the crown. They systematically destroyed the English aristocracy. In 1450, England had roughly 200 noble houses with the wealth and military power to shape the kingdom. By 1490, half of them were extinct. At Towton on Palm Sunday, 1461, an estimated 28,000 men died in a single afternoon in a blizzard — the bloodiest day in English military history before or since. Henry Tudor didn't found the Tudor dynasty by defeating Richard III at Bosworth. He inherited a country where the class that could have stopped him had already killed itself. This is the pattern when an aristocracy turns its weapons on itself. It doesn't get replaced by reform or restoration. It gets replaced by something more centralized than what it tried to defend. Today I'm joined by The Medieval Scholar (@MedievalScholar on X) to walk through one of the most thorough acts of aristocratic self-destruction in English history — the political landscape of 1450, the collapse of Henry VI's kingship, Warwick the Kingmaker's betrayals, Edward IV's undefeated military career, the carnage at Towton, the Redemption, Tewkesbury, the disappearance of the Princes in the Tower, and the final Plantagenet stand at Bosworth Field. Follow The Medieval Scholar on X: https://x.com/MedievalScholar Substack: Medieval Scholar
Ranking source
Apple Podcasts rankings via the Mato Topic Intelligence Platform.
Observed September 19, 2026.
Apple and Apple Podcasts are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.
Pairs with
Bring this source into Mato to read its transferable patterns, then turn them into an original show for your own audience.